"40k: First 7e Summoning Daemons Battle (link, w/ pictures)" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the SF Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article
|
tjkopena | 06 Jun 2014 7:40 a.m. PST |
Last night I got in my first game against a summoning Daemons army. The battle report and thoughts are here: link I also have two previous 7e battle reports and thoughts in these posts: link link Thx |
Sealion | 06 Jun 2014 9:40 a.m. PST |
Great write-up and cool looking game!!! Thanks for posting that ;) |
BlackKnight | 06 Jun 2014 12:13 p.m. PST |
Dear Sir: I am deeply offended by your post. It is deeply lacking in anger, negativity and resentment. Further, you have the temerity to post a battle report of the dastardly 7th edition that looked like a highly enjoyable game. Finally, you even made demon summoning look like it is not broken. For shame, sir, for shame. Sincerely, Professional Whiny Haters Club |
PatrickWR | 06 Jun 2014 2:00 p.m. PST |
The figures in that battle report appear to be fully painted. As such I am not convinced that a game of 40k was actually played. Where are the primer legions, the silver hordes, the basecoated barbarians? Just kidding, looks like a great game! |
JimSelzer | 06 Jun 2014 2:18 p.m. PST |
is 7e the one from Dark Venegence or is GW releasing another revised version? |
HostileContact | 06 Jun 2014 4:15 p.m. PST |
@Jim Selzer 7E is the new official GW 40K product. I'll let someone with more intimate familiarity discuss if its truly a 'new' edition, or a tweaked up 6th. HostileContact |
Sealion | 06 Jun 2014 4:26 p.m. PST |
Hi, In many ways it is similar to 6th edition with a few changes and/or additions. For example, vehicle armor penetration has changed a bit making vehicles in some cases a bit more durable. The psychic phase had been changed, too. There are other tweaks, but in my opinion, it is not too different than 6th. Call it edition 6.5 if you want ;) We have enjoyed it so far. I guess I should add that our group is not made up of tournament players. If you read forums that are more focused on the tournament scene, there is more negativity or, maybe better said, more issues with the rules. I'm good with them as is. For what it is worth
Take care :) |
tjkopena | 07 Jun 2014 5:35 a.m. PST |
I agree with Sealion, it's basically 6.5 edition. At first I was annoyed that GW put out essentially a tweaking just two years after the last main book, but now I think it was a good move. Vehicles I think are actually in a really good place, balanced between too strong (5e) and too weak (6e). The much better rules for buildings from the Stronghold Assault expansion got incorporated, and D weapons from the Escalation expansion got incorporated but in a much better and reasonable form. Shooting is a little different but I think is actually the most intuitive algorithm yet. The psychic phase is very different, but it's actually pretty straightforward. Army construction can be done traditionally or you can basically just do whatever you want. So, anybody who played in 6th edition should be pretty comfortable to just step into this one. For what it's worth, I have a little writeup here on how shooting changed and some of the implications: link It's actually interesting to look at even just from a game design perspective, not just the impact on playing 40k. |
|