Help support TMP


"Starships Movement Demo" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Blogs of War Message Board

Back to the Spaceship Gaming Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

GF9 Fire and Explosion Markers

Looking for a way to mark explosions or fire?


Featured Workbench Article

Powered-Armour Libby

Holger Schmidt Fezian of Fantasy Miniatures jumps at the chance to paint Hasslefree's Powered-armour Libby.


Featured Profile Article

Groundcloths & Battlesheets

Wargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.


Current Poll


879 hits since 4 Jun 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Meiczyslaw04 Jun 2014 8:54 p.m. PST

On the advice of folks smarter than me, I've put up a short (three minute) video on how movement works in PFM's Starships.

Link: youtu.be/4__MdrA0zlg

Captain Gideon04 Jun 2014 9:25 p.m. PST

I can tell you that in the rules I play which are StarBlazers Fleet Battle System and FASA Star Trek movement is different.

I think in some games simple is better IMHO.

However I did like your 3 minute video can you tell me what ship miniature that was?

Meiczyslaw04 Jun 2014 9:36 p.m. PST

I agree with you about simplicity. If I were to design a game (like Star Fleet Battles) that's built around ship systems and energy allocation, then I'd simplify the movement system.

Because realistic movement is the core of my game, it's the other bells and whistles that are simplified. If there's complexity in a rule — for example, direct fire has firing arcs and blind spots — it's because the rule affects how you move.

The spaceship is a Kharadorn destroyer from the Cold Navy line. That particular model is one that was produced by Xtreme Hobby back in the day. The line is currently produced in resin by Ravenstar Studios.

My review of the models I have is here (with pictures and links): link

Who asked this joker05 Jun 2014 10:37 a.m. PST

Same system as the Traveller module "Mayday". Mayday uses hexes though but that is where the difference really ends.

Meiczyslaw05 Jun 2014 6:50 p.m. PST

It's news to me, but I can't say I'm surprised. Traveller is like that.

Me, I was ripping off Asteroids.

… Hexes? Really? Was that, "count hexes along this grain, and then hexes along this grain?"

TheBeast Supporting Member of TMP06 Jun 2014 8:18 a.m. PST

It's used in several old games. Pretty sure it was in Delta V in SPI's Universe setting. I think GDW used it long before Mayday. Triplanetary?

It's been awhile since I played, but I believe BITS used it in Power Projection, also Traveller, but without the hexes.

In the hex versions, you use three chits: past position, current position, future position. You set the future to the same offset between past and present, then you modify future by thrust. Move past to current, current to future, rinse, repeat.

It's sometimes done with two markers, but I like three just for the 'where was I?' factor.

Doug

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.