Help support TMP


"Why Can’t America’s Newest Stealth Jet Land Like..." Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of TOWs


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Orisek's Tank Trap

A walk down memory lane - do you remember the Tank Trap?


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


856 hits since 28 May 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0128 May 2014 10:28 p.m. PST

…It's Supposed To?.

"There are big air shows in the UK this summer. The British public may be a little disappointed, however. The F-35B Joint Strike Fighter—the stealth jet that's supposed to be able to take off and land vertically, like a helicopter—will be on display for the first time outside the U.S. But it won't emulate the vertical landings that the Harrier family has made routine since the Beatles were playing dodgy nightclubs in Hamburg.

U.S. Marine aviation boss Brig. Gen. Matthew Glavy has said that there are no plans for the F-35B to perform vertical landings (VLs) in the UK, because the program has not finished testing the matting that's needed to protect the runway from exhaust heat. (The program office, the Marines, and Lockheed Martin did not return emails about any part of this story.) It may sound like a simple issue, but it pops the lids off two cans of worms: the program's relationship with the truth, and the operational utility of VL…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Jemima Fawr29 May 2014 5:49 a.m. PST

Yet another badly-informed and pathetically weak argument ('supposed to take off and land vertically'? Er no, it isn't).

In the meantime, my RAF/RN friends who are working on the things in South Carolina and Florida absolutely love them.

Lion in the Stars29 May 2014 10:05 a.m. PST

The time I remember seeing a Harrier do the 'vertical takeoff' trick, the announcer at the air show said that it was too hot for a fully vertical takeoff or landing (it was over 38degC that day), a vertical takeoff or landing would damage the runway of the civilian airport.

So we saw a ~250ft takeoff roll and a 50ft landing, IIRC. Still really dang impressive.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.