Help support TMP


"The Science of World War I: Communications" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Early 20th Century Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Acrylic Flight Stands from Litko

What flight stand for our Hurricanes?


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


646 hits since 19 May 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0119 May 2014 12:25 p.m. PST

"World War I is frequently referred to as "the first modern war," since a number of technological inventions made their debut during the war, which lasted from 1914 to 1918.

Nowhere was this more true than in the realm of communications — the recent introduction of electricity- and radio-based communications revolutionized the art of war, joining other advances such as military airplanes, tanks, machine guns and chemical weapons.

Despite these new technologies, many military leaders were slow to take advantage of them and continued to wage war as if it were a cavalry-based affair. Their reluctance (or inability) to adapt to new methods of warfare has been cited as one reason World War I was such a bloody affair, resulting in more than 17 million civilian and military deaths…"
Full article here.
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Abwehrschlacht19 May 2014 1:16 p.m. PST

'Their reluctance (or inability) to adapt to new methods of warfare has been cited as one reason World War I was such a bloody affair' That's a pretty outdated way of looking at the First World War…

Personal logo Jlundberg Supporting Member of TMP19 May 2014 5:57 p.m. PST

Agreed, Abwehrschlacht. The command staff was caught in a bind. Too close to the lines and communications were constantly interrupted when the telephone lines were cut by artillery, too far and they lost sight of what was going on. Technological innovations were rapidly used and applied in new ways. The Marne was won at least in part by conscripting the Paris taxis. Aircraft were used by the brits to recon prior to the battle of Mons. And on and on

monk2002uk19 May 2014 7:26 p.m. PST

How ironic then that both the German and British cavalry went to war in August 1914 with wireless transmitters/receivers ;-) Heinz Guderian, for example, was a wireless operator for a German cavalry division in August 1914. This is one of the reasons why he placed such high importance on wireless comms for the newly forming panzer units in the Wehrmacht during the lead up to WW2.

Robert

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.