Help support TMP


"Assembly of new Robotech RPG Tactics figures" Topic


19 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 6mm Sci-Fi Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Halo Clix Size Comparisons

TheMackster Fezian takes pics to show how the Halo figures compare, size-wise.


Featured Profile Article

A Tabletop of Sci-Fi Paper Scenics

Have you faced the power of paper?


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


2,530 hits since 19 May 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

FoxtrotDeuce19 May 2014 9:51 a.m. PST

I backed this kickstarter and am worried they are too many pieces! but someone previewed them here and maybe they are not so bad?

link

Hope you like!

Pictors Studio19 May 2014 10:27 a.m. PST

Those do look sweet. I'll probably buy into that when I see it at a store.

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP19 May 2014 10:48 a.m. PST

Nice! It's about time Robotech saw some hard plastic love!

parrot150019 May 2014 11:03 a.m. PST

hard plastic love!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA heee

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP19 May 2014 12:10 p.m. PST

*facepalm*

I am such an idiot sometimes…

Caesar19 May 2014 2:30 p.m. PST

Plastic injection, no less!

charles popp19 May 2014 5:05 p.m. PST

Still not released yet huh. Wow.

Moonbeast19 May 2014 6:05 p.m. PST

"Still not released yet huh. Wow."

It'll be released sometime this year. I'm in it for somewhere in the neighborhood of $600 USD or so. I've waited this long, I can wait longer. Besides, I have plenty of other projects to keep me busy in the meantime.:)Good to see the figures are shaping up rather nice, which make the wait worth it (IMO).

Quaker19 May 2014 6:36 p.m. PST

The issue is with the RDF mechs where the joins are along the flat front surfaces, and the early examples were poorly moulded so there was a lot of gap. And they did extra silly things like splitting open missile bay doors down the middle instead of having a separate single piece that could be glued/clipped in place.

Those designs were certainly not up to the standards I expect of plastic wargaming kits in 2014.

These battlepods on the other hand look to have been designed properly with single-part legs and the join for the pod hull nut running straight through the front of the pod.

Glenn M20 May 2014 3:03 p.m. PST

Look at the legs and explain how they can be molded without being two piece? I can't see a single good way to cast them so that the seam doesn't suck, remember it's plastic, so 0 undercuts.

Does it suck, yes, but that's the downfall of hard plastic and working with existing designs, if they didn't have to follow the art they could have tweaked the design to make them cast easier.

Failure1620 May 2014 4:08 p.m. PST

Strangely enough, FASA (well, Ral Partha) did it--one-plus pieces--with those exact same designs in metal and later resin, and Catalyst Game Labs (though different designs) in plastic.

Remember, these are gaming pieces that are expressly supposed to be used en masse, not singular models in colloquial terms. They promised large amounts of poseability and extreme detail and right now I am seeing little of the former, and certainly no more (if not outright less) of the latter than I have in my Unseen BattleTech 'Mechs.

Chortle Fezian20 May 2014 6:57 p.m. PST

I also backed this KS. I thought it was supposed to deliver at the end of last year? I find it is best to forget these things and then be pleasantly surprised if/when they show up.

Ivan DBA21 May 2014 12:08 a.m. PST

Failure16: regarding metal and resin, Palladium has explained (and this sounds right) that it's much easier to do complex shapes in a single-piece casting, because metal and resin use flexible molds (allowing for undercuts), whereas plastic uses rigid steel molds. That's supposedly why they had to break up the different parts this way.

For example, those two little ridges on the mech's shins: if the legs were in a single piece, the plastic would locked in the mold by those. (While a rubber mold for a metal casting would flex around them, allowing for removal).

Still, I agree this is not looking ideal, and surely it would have been better to compromise on a few details than have every piece being split right down the middle? They keep saying the fit will be better on the production pieces, but even if it is excellent, a seam will be visible short of filling and sanding each join.

I also backed this one, and have just resigned myself to patience, and hope that the finished product will be better than what we have seen so far.

The Regults look great though, so there is that.

Morpheus197521 May 2014 5:26 a.m. PST

Try the painted Glaug here
link

Morpheus197521 May 2014 5:28 a.m. PST

Rules Demo/Review
link

mdauben21 May 2014 7:21 a.m. PST

Ivan DBA has the right of it. The design as shown would be impossible to mold in plastic without a bad seam somewhere. The only way to fix this would be to remove or change the surface detail, which would have elicited its own set of complaints from people demanding accuracy in the sculpts.

I do suspect there are things that could have been done to minimize those seams, but that might have upped the total number of pieces per mecha, which is already drawing criticism.

I'm not sure there is anything PB or ND could have done to please everyone on this issue.

Chuckaroobob21 May 2014 8:57 a.m. PST

I can see myself buying some Ventraedi when they hit the shelves.

Failure1621 May 2014 4:39 p.m. PST

Ivan DBA, mdauben, I understand the physical/logistical necessities and realities of why things are being done the general way they are. But that does not change the gist of my argument: chiefly that other companies have managed to produced miniatures in the same scale as these (and of the same designs) and not managed to make them into what *may* be an assembly-nightmare.

Indeed, for just one example of how to ease assembly, look at Quaker's comment above regarding the missile pack.

All things considered, perhaps the limitations of the chosen material should have been more-fully researched and perhaps different choices could have been made. There is evidence that fairly complex and highly detailed mecha models can be produced in plastic (witness the premium 'Mechs in the last two BattleTech starter sets) without being dozen-piece models…for a game that all but demands there be (or at least is plainly geared towards) a score or more models per side.

I am a backer too. I imagined that I would be getting pieces commensurate to the quality and ease of my old Ral Partha BattleTech models (mentioned only as a reference point), but that appears not to be the case. However, we have yet to see any real production photos, especially of the Destroids, so only time will tell. Ideally, hopefully, certain issues will be resolved and the final products will be worthy of their touting. In any event, my own desires in the early days of the Kickstarter have certainly colored my views today.

Regardless, it will be nice when they are done, not so?

Cergorach21 May 2014 4:43 p.m. PST


The design as shown would be impossible to mold in plastic without a bad seam somewhere.

While it would be impossible to have no mold lines, in a lot of cases it would be possible to make a part without the model seams. But instead of the the two part mold they have been using here, they would have needed a multi part mold. Might cost more, but it also makes the footprint a lot smaller, which would save money. Because even Ninja Magic have 0 experience with hard plastics, they didn't think of that particular possibility…

I've also seen better engineered model Mech kits, especially from Bandai, seams that are hidden by overlapping plates, etc.

Can't really blame a company that's a first time 'supplier' of hard plastic kits, but all that, it's impossible is just a load of rubbish!

Dreamforge did far better in that regard, but it seems that NoseGoblin is a more knowledgeable sculptor, who's more hands on and Wargames Factory China has better and/or more helpful engineers that understand the hobby and the product…

What I don't get is that a Space Marine has 10-12+ parts each, and you need a few dozen of those as well. Only the fighter mode has significantly more parts, but so does a SM sergeant…

It looks like there are a lot of folks that have never played with HQ hard plastics before, they are either familiar with prepainted minis (no assembly required) or are only familiar with the simpler metal Mechs…

Stop complaining, I ordered ~600 of these models and I'll be assembling those until my [s]beard[/s] goatee is completely white! ;-)

Cergorach21 May 2014 5:04 p.m. PST


chiefly that other companies have managed to produced miniatures in the same scale as these (and of the same designs) and not managed to make them into what *may* be an assembly-nightmare.

And made them from expensive metal or even more expensive resin, or bendy pvc? I have some Macross Gashpons that have less parts and are from a hard plastic (but probably also PVC), but those are a LOT bigger (1/160 vs. 1/300, less fiddly mold), made by companies that have a LOT of experience.


witness the premium 'Mechs in the last two BattleTech starter sets

Erm, I have here a 'premium' Mad Cat and Battlemaster and they are still PVC requiring horrible super glue instead of godly plastic glue (that bonds far better by melting the two parts together). Lines aren't as hard as on a 'proper' hard plastic miniature. Don't get me wrong, these are still miles ahead of the old BT plastic crap, but they don't look half as sharp as the Regult Pods in the latest blogpost.

The Mad Cat is still a 6 piece model that is completely static. The Battlemaster is only 5 pieces and make Pinochio look like a dancer from Swanlake… The Robotech Mech can be build with few as 8 pieces and has options on the sprue to construct multiple poses and multiple variants. The BT kit doesn't even come close!

What I'm afraid of is that folks start complaining of 'horrible' model seams after assembling the minis with super glue… Those things are supposed to be assembled with plastic glue, if you do that properly, you won't have any seams. Because the melted/bonded plastic it is now one part, cut away the excess plastic with a sharp knife. If necessary, sand the service with a fine sand paper.

They assembled six Regult Pods in under an hour, ~11 pieces per pod. That's quite quick imho…

Edit:

Found some painted pictures up on the Facebook page of a Glaug Pod, absolutely no effort was made to hide the seams (which offend my OCD tendencies):

mdauben22 May 2014 7:40 a.m. PST

Found some painted pictures up on the Facebook page of a Glaug Pod, absolutely no effort was made to hide the seams (which offend my OCD tendencies)

I have to agree. Overall, I like the look of the miniature and the paint job shows it off nicely, but with all the complaints about the "horrible joints" for the last two months, you would think they'd spend the little bit of time it would have taken to clean up the seams on this display model. While they look bad, I certainly don't see anything that could not have been fixed with a little bit more prep work before the paint job. :-/

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.