Help support TMP


"Capetian Frank Minis" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board

Back to the Medieval Product Reviews Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Homemade Palm Trees

Dervel Fezian returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Movie Review


1,100 hits since 1 May 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
FreeportPirate01 May 2014 11:21 a.m. PST

Should I take it from the fact that I can't find even one line of 28mm Capetian Frank minis that I can just use my Norman models and that'd be appropriate? The medieval French lines all seem to be for later armies (100 Years War, etc.).

Garand01 May 2014 11:47 a.m. PST

By the time the Normans became players on the historical scene, they were already largely "francofied," so I would say yes, these would be fine for portraying the rest of France, barring any local idiocyncracies. Keep in mind that many of the knights and foot troops in William's army were non-Normans , like the Bretons or Flemish that were with his army. Arms and armor would this be very similar.

Damon.

janner02 May 2014 2:40 a.m. PST

You can also use 'Crusader' ranges for the Capetians.

First Crusade for Philip I, Second for Louis VII, Third/Fourth for Philip II depending on era etc.

Great War Ace02 May 2014 7:32 a.m. PST

First Crusade had more common use of extended mail for the arms and legs. But such armor for "elites" was already in use by 1066. Other than that, there was no visible difference in the armor between the Conquest and the First Crusade. I am of the opinion that the rounded top on the "kite" shields was already starting get flattened or cut off by the First Crusade, but this did not become commonplace until well into the 12th century. Crossbows were becoming much more common by the beginning of the crusades era, eclipsing bows until the advent of the English use of the "longbow" much later….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.