"In the 1980s, Iran Outfitted F-14s as Heavy Bombers" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleFirst of a series – scenario starters!
|
Tango01 | 29 Apr 2014 11:10 p.m. PST |
"Nearly 30 years, ago, the Iranian air force modified its U.S.-built F-14 Tomcat fighters to carry air-to-ground ordnance—including, in one spectacular case, a massive, 3.5-ton bomb. Iran's bitter enemy Iraq actually inspired the idea of outfitting the twin-engine, swing-wing F-14s as bombers. Iran and Iraq fought a bloody war between 1980 and 1988. Iraq's most notorious interceptor and recon jets were also its most prolific bombers. Baghdad's Soviet-supplied MiG-25 Foxbats could carry free-fall bombs and still reach Mach 2.5 at 60,000 feet
" Full article here. link Amicalement Armand |
daubere | 30 Apr 2014 7:22 a.m. PST |
Iron bombs don't need much in the way of high tech – strap 'em on, and let 'em go is all that's required. Max underside stores for a Tomcat was 7 tonnes. Half of that on one hardpoint is pushing it a bit though. |
darthfozzywig | 30 Apr 2014 8:19 a.m. PST |
Given that the Tomcat's forerunner/competitor became the F-111, it's not a stretch to use it as a bomber. We did that ourselves over Iraq and Afghanistan. What's stranger (to me) is that the top F-14 ace is Iranian. Woulda thought it was one of these guys for sure:
|
jowady | 30 Apr 2014 7:45 p.m. PST |
It's one thing to carry bombs, it's quite another to actually hit your target with them. |
Lion in the Stars | 30 Apr 2014 10:45 p.m. PST |
Yeah, doesn't do much good to drag a bomb with you if your accuracy is worse than WW2 bombers! |
Deadone | 06 May 2014 11:11 p.m. PST |
The USN F-14s were upgraded to carry ground attack ordnance and were actually quite capable in the role. Indeed the F-14B was known as the Bombcat. Dunno what sort of upgrades Iranian ones had. As for MiG-25, the MiG-25RB reconnaissance version had a ground attack capability whereas the P/PD interceptor variants did not. The Syrians have been using their MiG-25RB's against rebels. They've also been using MiG-29s and even MiG-23MF/MLs in ground attack role as their stocks of L-39, Su-22, Su-24 and MiG-23BN ground attack aircraft dwindles. |
SouthernPhantom | 08 May 2014 6:12 p.m. PST |
ThomasHobbes, I've heard that munitions, maintenance, and general fatigue have been the primary causes for force depletion over there. Actual losses to enemy fire seem minimal- the snackbar es have -poor AAA. |
Deadone | 08 May 2014 9:11 p.m. PST |
SouthernPhantom, that's what I've heard. There were a considerable number of confirmed kills early on when the SyAF was flying low level sorties but these have diminished since they've taken to far less accurate high altitude bombing. Another problem was the rebels capturing several airbases including 2 major helicopter bases and at least 1 base equipped with L-39ZOs as well as from memory one of their main overhaul depots. Whereas the rebels have not captured anything operational, the SyAF still lost whatever was grounded for whatever reason as well as spares and ammunition. Also the Russians have agreed to supply the 36 Yak-130 trainers/light attack jets the Syrians ordered some time ago:
defensenews.com/article/20140506/DEFREG04/305060025/Russia-Supply-Yak-130-Jet-Trainers-Syria?odyssey=mod%7Cnewswell%7Ctext%7CFRONTPAGE%7Cp 9 in 2014 12 in 2015 15 in 2016
That should revitalise SyAF COIN attack capability. Dunno if the deal includes guided weapons. |
|