"Military Costume in Códice De Trajes, 1547" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Renaissance Media Message Board Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Profile ArticleIf you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!
|
Druzhina | 17 Apr 2014 4:05 a.m. PST |
|
Daniel S | 17 Apr 2014 4:42 a.m. PST |
The "Mamelukes"/"Mosqvwiter" based on Hopfer look much more eastern European than Egyptian. The CDJ version look a lot like Wallachians and fur hats would not exactly be a good choice of headwear for the middle east. Hopfers original also has more than a few "eastern European" details as well. I will have to check my collection of Landsknecht images but I think that both the fähnrich and the arquebusier are copied from older images. On the whole all of the Landsknechts look a bit old fashioned for 1547 if compared to other mid-late 1540's images. (There is a noteworthy absence of the Spanish influende which led to the Pluderhose to name one thing.) For example the extreme version of the kurzhosen worn by the arquebusier is usually found in images from about 1515-1530 but there is a 1543 print by Hans-Sebald Beham which shows it as well. The question of course is if the print date is accurate or not. (Could well be an old engraving that had gathered dust until printed in 1543) |
GurKhan | 17 Apr 2014 8:30 a.m. PST |
|
Druzhina | 19 Apr 2014 2:49 a.m. PST |
|
|