Help support TMP


"Review: - USS Defiant " Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Product Reviews Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Return of the Gretchinmobile

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian goes back to the year 2000!


Featured Profile Article

Rubbery Transformers

Looking for some inexpensive mecha?


Featured Movie Review


1,195 hits since 9 Apr 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0109 Apr 2014 9:16 p.m. PST

"Time I caught up with my Eaglemoss reviews! Next in line in The Official Starships Collection is the USS Defiant, so how did Eaglemoss do with this tough little ship? Well it's pretty good overall, but marred by one unfortunate error. Read on to find out more.

The first thing I noticed about this model is that's is quite light, and indeed small. In fact it's the shortest (on its longest side) of any ship in the series up to this issue, just 11cm long; which makes it overall about the same size as the saucer section of the Enterprise-D model. I'm a little surprised by this, as the smaller ships in the series generally have been the ones restricted in overall size due to being long thin designs. The Defiant has the exact opposite proportions, it's pretty much bang-on the 4:3 ratio of the standard box size of these ships, which is why I was anticipating it would be one of the more substantial models in the series. Perhaps that was exactly the reason they decided to make it a bit smaller; maybe it looked too big compared to the other more spindly ships?

Anyway, while being a little smaller than expected, it's still a reasonable handful of starship. The dorsal side of the primary hull is the metal component of this model, with the underside, nacelles and nose all in plastic. Both metal and plastic components have molded details, and while the plastic parts are, as ever, fractionally sharper in those details, the metal section holds up very well, and overall there's a nice consistent finish to the ship…"

picture

picture

picture

picture

Full review here.
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.