"Why the F-5 Tiger was the perfect plane to simulate ..." Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleOne way to base Modern Pulp figures for a wide variety of environments.
Featured Profile ArticleScenario ideas from Afghanistan in 2002.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 | 01 Apr 2014 10:03 p.m. PST |
Soviet "Bandits" in adversary missions. "Developed as an advanced version of the F-5 fighter, the Northrop F-5E was selected to be the International Fighter Aircraft to follow the F-5A, and over 950 Tiger II were delivered to a wide variety of countries around the world. Moreover the F-5E demonstrated to be the perfect fighter to provide Dissimilar Air Combat Training (DACT), that's why U.S. Navy and Marines still use it as adversary in mock air-to-air engagements. U.S. Naval Aviation is the main Tiger II operator among the U.S. Armed Forces and it flies the N variant, a type of F-5E previously operated by the Swiss Air Force. As pointed out by Chad Mingo, a pilot from Fighter Composite Squadron 13 (VFC-13) Saints (that with the VFC-111 Sundowners and with the VMFT-401, is one of the last three U.S. units to fly the F-5), in Rick Llinares book "Strike Beyond Top Gun", the key advantage of the F-5 is to be relatively inexpensive to fly. Nevertheless according to Mingo there are several differences between the E and N models: "The N model is a little heavier than the E and has several improvements, including RWR gear (radar warning receiver) and enhanced radars, as well as antiskid systems, which provide enhanced handling on wet runways
" Full article here link Amicalement Armand |
elsyrsyn | 02 Apr 2014 7:45 a.m. PST |
It's also a really pretty bird. Doug |
Dynaman8789 | 02 Apr 2014 10:54 a.m. PST |
Especially pretty when painted black too. |
15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 02 Apr 2014 12:48 p.m. PST |
I still call it a 'MiG-28'
But yeah, I like the lines of the Tiger II. It's too bad the F-20 Tigershark never went into production. That aircraft would still be serving in air forces today if it did.
|
Deadone | 02 Apr 2014 3:07 p.m. PST |
Tigershark was a great little jet. It would've been successful if the USA had adopted a few squadrons for Aggressor duties and the F-16 had been kept under export restrictions. The worst thing is the way US fighter development has gone, there is no light weight fighter left to sell to smaller countries (F-16 is now middle of the road).
And in the future it's only the F-35 and nothing else. Nowonder the Swedes are optimistic with their JAS-39 Gripen.
|
Mako11 | 02 Apr 2014 4:39 p.m. PST |
The F-5 is a cool little jet. We have a black one (single, most of the time) fly overhead daily. Not sure where it goes, or why, but it is on a very regular schedule. I'm not a fan of the black "camo" scheme, but it does make it easier to spot. |
SouthernPhantom | 03 Apr 2014 7:05 a.m. PST |
Mako, I'd guess that it's a private aggressor bird. There are quite a few of those, especially out of Lakeland. |
Mako11 | 03 Apr 2014 12:56 p.m. PST |
No, it flies out of Beale every day. You can see them on the tarmac, with a satellite search. Every once in a while there are a pair, flying together, but that's probably less than 5% of the time. Flies south in the morning, and north in the afternoon, evening, daily. |
Deadone | 03 Apr 2014 3:59 p.m. PST |
Probably some kind of test bird (though I'm probably stating the obvious). |
|