Help support TMP


"The von der Tann " Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Royal Artillery OQF 18 Pdr Field Battery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets started with WWI British in 15mm.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Featured Movie Review


986 hits since 27 Mar 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0127 Mar 2014 11:03 p.m. PST

"SMS von der Tann was the first German battlecruiser, and is widely accepted to have been a much more successful design than her British equivalents. She carried 50% more armour than the Indefatigable class battlecruisers (5,693 tons compared to 3,735 tons) without sacrificing speed. At the battle of Jutland she destroyed the British battlecruiser Indefatigable, while herself taking four serious hits.

Contrary to popular believe, the von der Tann did not sacrifice firepower to gain her extra armour protection. Eight German 12in guns would have only added 80 tons to the weight of her guns. Partly because of her battery of 5.9in guns, the armaments of the von der Tann actually weighed more than those of the British Indefatigable class. The 1,958 tons for the extra armour on von der Tann came from a combination of a lighter hull (1,000 tons), lighter machinery (600t) and an overall increase of 350 tons in weight. Her design would suggest that the British did not need to sacrifice quite so much armour to achieve the desired combination of firepower and speed.

The real motivation for the choice of 11.1in guns for von der Tann would appear to have been cost. The Naval budget was already stretched close to the limit by the need to build a fleet of dreadnoughts and so plans to use 12in or 13.8in guns were abandoned. The 11.1in guns proved to be perfectly capable of taking on the more lightly armed British battlecruisers, but they gave the von der Tann a broadside weight of 5,238lbs, compared to the 6,800lbs of the Invincible and Indefatigable class battlecruisers or the 7,144lbs offered by the main German 12in guns…"
Full article here.
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

hindsTMP Supporting Member of TMP28 Mar 2014 8:16 a.m. PST

Tango, you already posted on that ship in the thread below.
IMHO, the moral is search first, then post!

TMP link

Here's another one, although with different material.

TMP link

Mark

Tango0128 Mar 2014 10:54 a.m. PST

I'm getting old my friend (smile).
Thanks for the data.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.