"Painting Pacific Theatre Australians " Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board Back to the WWII Painting Guides Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Rating: 
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article What's in the Grenadier Company set, revised as part of the D-Day releases from Battlefront?
Featured Movie Review
|
| cbaxter | 17 Mar 2014 10:36 p.m. PST |
one of our guys did a pretty awesome painting guide link |
| Cardinal Hawkwood | 17 Mar 2014 11:10 p.m. PST |
I refrain from commenting |
| CCollins | 18 Mar 2014 12:08 a.m. PST |
They're nice wargames figgies, Though I think they look more like Chindits/14th army than 2nd AIF. US style gaiters are probably the distinctive difference, and E-tools weren't issued 'till post war.
But then I'm not sure they're readily available and untill that happens, they'll do (and you can use them for chindits!) Cheers Chris |
| Wargamer Blue | 18 Mar 2014 4:34 a.m. PST |
Lots of wrong things here. Recommend Brigade Games Diggers in the Pacific range rather than those 14th Army figures. |
| Ethanjt21 | 18 Mar 2014 5:09 a.m. PST |
Regardless of any inaccuracies, they are extremely well painted. |
| cbaxter | 18 Mar 2014 10:06 a.m. PST |
thank you Ethan I will let our painter know |
| GROSSMAN | 18 Mar 2014 10:10 a.m. PST |
|
| Cardinal Hawkwood | 18 Mar 2014 9:57 p.m. PST |
US HBT trousers as well..I commented |
| Wargamer Blue | 19 Mar 2014 2:10 a.m. PST |
No thigh pockets in HBT. Also, wrong flamethrower. Aussies used the US version. |
|
paints a machinegun emplacement, and realizes he needs more...
