"Chinese Armors of the 4th - 10th C AD" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients Medieval Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleCommand figures for the 1410 Teutonics.
Featured Workbench ArticleAdam loves Scorched Brown...
Featured Profile ArticlePart II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
Lagartija Mike | 19 Feb 2014 9:24 p.m. PST |
tomb figures, grave and religious art seem to display very complicated zoomorphic leatherwork. Haven't seen much represented in the available lines, and the Osprey books are massively slipshod on this topic. Input? |
Mapleleaf | 19 Feb 2014 10:53 p.m. PST |
try here for some modern llustrations link |
Likui006 | 20 Feb 2014 3:59 a.m. PST |
Here are some illustrations as well.. link |
Lewisgunner | 20 Feb 2014 7:17 a.m. PST |
The links that Mapleleaf andLikui supplied are excellent. the Complex plate with high relief decoration may well be a representation of gods or of tomb guardians and thus not reflect normal military wear . the links. orrectly show this as much more practical. |
Lagartija Mike | 20 Feb 2014 3:19 p.m. PST |
Likui and Maplefeaf, thanks. I am, tho', familiar with these sources. My contention is that the zoomorphic armors are not nessecarily impractical and may have served specific purposes. My focus is the Turkish influence on N/S to Sui Dynastic stuff where the elaborate leatherwork resembles so much elements of the armor of tarkhans and other elite units. |
Mapleleaf | 20 Feb 2014 8:26 p.m. PST |
Zoomorphic design is a common theme in all of Chinese Art The Phoenix and Dragon, as the symbol of the Empress ( Female) and Emperor(Male), is the most common, so it is not surprising to see it carried forward into the details on Chines Armor. I have the feeling that what survived in both pictoria and actual material is more akin to ceremonial rather then service armpr. I have attached a link to a site on Ming designs showing how designs of various animals and birds were used to designate ranks There is no reason not to thing that this practice was established very early on in Chinese History and would equally to both military an civil dress. chinesecostumes.wordpress.com |
Wansui | 20 Feb 2014 11:13 p.m. PST |
You might want to check out 画说中国历代甲胄 I can post some pictures if necessary. |
GurKhan | 21 Feb 2014 3:01 a.m. PST |
"My focus is the Turkish influence on N/S to Sui Dynastic stuff where the elaborate leatherwork resembles so much elements of the armor of tarkhans and other elite units." That depends on what your sources are for zoomorphic Turkish armour. For example David Nicolle's "Nomadic Hordes" Osprey has a plate of a "Turgesh tarkhan" in elaborate armour with zoomorphic shoulder-pieces: but the source for that isn't Turkish at all, but Soghdian. |
Thylacine in Domino | 22 Feb 2014 12:20 p.m. PST |
GurKhan, I think I remember the McBride plate. Had shoulder protection figured like lions heads if I'm not mistaken. Zoomorphy is a common theme in Central Asian imagery: from Rostom's tiger-headed helmet and animal-head mace, through the Turkic and Scythian arts, to the details on Shang and Zhou bronzes and associated arts. The Soghdian's deployment of the imagery merely indicates the breadth and inclusiveness of the tradition. |
|