"Yet ANOTHER unreliable TMP statistic." Topic
12 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the TMP Talk Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Back to the plastic jungle…
Featured Workbench Article What's this FlexSteel we're always talking about?
Featured Profile Article The Editor heads for Vicksburg...
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| John the OFM | 05 Feb 2014 5:42 p.m. PST |
So, I decided to do a minor spelling edit of my post.
I glanced at the 'hit" statistic in the Message Editor, and it told me 47,987.
That seemed a bit low, so I went back in and it said 59,456. well, OK. That IS a bit higher…  |
| John the OFM | 05 Feb 2014 5:55 p.m. PST |
On the one hand, I would not mind if ALL TMP stats became random and meaningless. Lately, it seems to have silenced my whining anal stalkers who sneer about people trying to inflate post counts. If they are inaccurate… On the other hand, there was a perverse pride on hitting a milestone like 25K or 50K, so I could do my Ozymandias schtick. |
| John the OFM | 05 Feb 2014 5:57 p.m. PST |
|
John Leahy  | 05 Feb 2014 6:14 p.m. PST |
|
| VonTed | 05 Feb 2014 6:25 p.m. PST |
Must track google webcrawling auto hits |
| Stryderg | 05 Feb 2014 6:27 p.m. PST |
Oh, come now…Don't you realize that 87.3% of all statistics are made up right on the spot? |
rmcaras  | 05 Feb 2014 6:37 p.m. PST |
oh don't speak in code John, you meant the Napoleonic Discussion groupies with that oblique reference. |
| darthfozzywig | 05 Feb 2014 11:04 p.m. PST |
|
| dandandan | 06 Feb 2014 12:41 a.m. PST |
|
| Doug em4miniatures | 06 Feb 2014 3:35 a.m. PST |
whining anal stalkers That can have so many meanings…. Doug |
|
