Help support TMP


"10mm 1944 US vs Germans Battle Report" Topic


26 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Solo Wargamers Message Board

Back to the WWII Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Basing Small-Scale Aircraft for Wargames

Mal Wright Fezian experiments to find a better way to mount aircraft for wargaming.


Featured Profile Article


1,071 hits since 20 Jan 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP20 Jan 2014 8:20 p.m. PST

All,

Sorry folks, my gaming pause has been brought to you by REAL LIFE. So it's been awhile, and I'm sorry but I've had some stuff going on. On a positive note, I've received a huge order from Pendraken, and have gotten it prepped and primed. The same goes for a small order from Minifigs, and I've got some coastal stuff still in the bag from Dave at PT Dockyard.

In any case, I finally got back to the game table! If you recall, I'd come up with this idea about coming up with a map, set forces for US and Germans, and a scheme of maneuver for a four-fight, battalion-sized operation, and I played the first fight a couple (few?) weeks ago. I actually set the table up last weekend, then finally got a chance to fight it out this weekend.

picture

This was my original scheme of maneuver. I previously played the 1st first fight (box 1), in which the US 'A' Company, with tank support, fought onto the map, taking heavy casualties but overcoming a series of German strongpoints in order to gain a jump-off point for crossing the river.

The plan sketched out above is still roughly the plan, although the crossing operation itself has changed. The battalion conducted reconnaissance and found two fords (in addition to the roadbridge), one to the east and one to the west. While neither ford (due to steep, muddy banks) is suitable for vehicle crossing, they are suitable for infantry, and the US Battalion Commander is determined to use them. So, as opposed to a single axis of attack the battalion has changed to two-pronged attack, with one sweeping to the west (as shown above), and one sweeping to the east (not shown).

The big difference, for those following the original concept, is that I'm not going to play battles 2, 3, and 4 out separately, this batrep is me playing all three of them at the same time. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

picture

As M4 Shermans moves towards the bridge (top center), a PaK-40 ATG unmasks to engage.

picture

Sneaky Americans of Baker Company's 2nd Platoon (center) are hugging the river bank, moving towards the ford (at left), when out pop two German rifle platoons (top center and top right).

picture

Then things got a little crazy; at top left is an abandoned PzJgr IV, being kept company by Charlie Company's 1st Platoon. At right is a slew of broken, burning, and abandoned US armor with Baker's 3rd Platoon, opposite a 'live' PzJgr IV.

For the full write up and a whole lot more pics, please visit my blog at:
link

V/R,
Jack

War Panda20 Jan 2014 9:48 p.m. PST

I thought you were MIA for sure…but your back with a bang!!! I believe that's my favorite AAR…brilliantly thought out scenario, very exciting stuff all round…worth the wait!

BTW love the new minis and terrain!

Zargon21 Jan 2014 12:35 a.m. PST

This is great stuff Jack. I'm very interested in the 10mm stuff and wondering if its for me (as opposed to the usual 28mm and 15mm) your AAR has me really thinking about it.

(I am looking at the table size and really like the manageable sizes of it all and its actual platoons working not little units of ones and twos as well.

Plus the 'cute' factor is in play here with me looking at those tanks,it all look just brilliant. Cheers to you

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP21 Jan 2014 10:03 a.m. PST

Thanks fellas, I really appreciate it. I'm back, and it felt great! I need more hours in the day, as this got me excited about campaigning with a reinforced infantry battalion; probably have a couple company commanders named Dillon and Keepers ;)

I think I've finally got my Black Powder mods finished, and so I believe my next game will be some French and Brits in the Napoleonic era. I'm also working on some rules for individual skirmishing (WWII and Modern) using, get this: some Pulp rules. It's probaly sounds funny, but it's really interesting and I think I can make it work.

This is to say nothing of the WWII USMC vs. IJA, my 'Cuba Libre' project, and Indochina French vs. Vietminh I need to get to, and the 'All Americans' and Perplakistan/Tumoria I need to get back to… Plus all the stuff I need to get painted: Afrika Korps and early war French are the two big ones, with a whole bunch of odds and ends.

Zargon – As you see, I'm a big believer in 10mm. To me it's great for size (big enough to see, not so big as to give you hub to hub battles), the ranges look right, the cost is right, just love it. This fight was the first one I've done on a 6' x 4' in a long time; usually I play on a 3' x 3' or 4' x 4', and I use 10mm for individually-based skirmish up to element-based (stand is a squad) battalion level.

V/R,
Jack

War Panda21 Jan 2014 5:54 p.m. PST

Yes I always knew I was destined for greatness; I just didn't realize how great!!!

(Don't be too excited kyotebluer…officers don't last too long under his command)

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP21 Jan 2014 8:47 p.m. PST

You two simmer down, you'll be fine, trust me ;)

You've got it all wrong anyways; you're senior officers, or what we used to call 'strap-hangers,' 'cake-eaters,' etc… The worst your miniature 10mm representatives will have to deal with is a paper cut or being scalded by hot coffee! Or maybe an arty barrage, or if the command post gets overrun. Okay, so a little dangerous…

I need more time! Not sure when I'll get to this, but I figure I need a battalion commander, three rifle company commanders, a weapons company commander, a tank company commander, and about 20 platoon commanders… You guys are two of my loyal, vocal (in terms of posting) readers, so you're guaranteed spots, and there are two more worthy of command (Shaun Travers here, and Mr. Ronan from another forum, are the other two).

We'll see what happens, hope all's well.

V/R,
Jack

War Panda21 Jan 2014 10:25 p.m. PST

Keepers, I have a gut feeling we'll do just fine…especially with a title of "cake-eater"…frankly my gut tells me I'm over-qualified!

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP22 Jan 2014 9:12 a.m. PST

If you're worried about seeming unmanly, I could make you the 'lead from the front type,' and you could head up a couple close assaults. No guarantees you'll be around for the next game though, or maybe your legend grows: now one of you sports an eye-patch, the other an empty sleeve, but still leading your forces to victory! You never know.

Panda-John – Saw your posts about Bolt Action and Chain of Command. You can see now that my activation system for 'All Americans' was pulled (largely) from Bolt Action, but with my own, simplified combat rules.

And I forgot Joe Legan! He'll be the Battalion Commander!

Take care guys.

V/R,
Jack

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP22 Jan 2014 6:39 p.m. PST

Done! Sorry Panda-John, eyepatches are on a 'first-come, first-serve' basis.

Oh, and from here on out Panda-John will be referred to as Captain Old Bean ;)

V/R,
Jack

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP23 Jan 2014 9:24 p.m. PST

I just posted the order of battle on my blog! Gentlemen, take your places, please. If you have a 'different' user name on a forum, and you're looking at one of the names on the OOB and you're thinking, 'I wonder if that's me?' it is.

V/R,
Jack

Shaun Travers24 Jan 2014 4:25 a.m. PST

Jack,

Congrats on another great report.

And I look forward to being in command of something in the future.

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP24 Jan 2014 6:37 a.m. PST

Sorry John, don't know what happened, should be fixed now.

V/R,
Jack

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP24 Jan 2014 11:39 a.m. PST

Well, yeah man, it hasn't happened… YET.

But the way I play, I hope I don't end up photoshopping everything but a torso ;)

Jack

War Panda24 Jan 2014 10:06 p.m. PST

Looking good everybody…this is a great idea Jack; we won't let you down :)

War Panda25 Jan 2014 8:18 a.m. PST

Meat in the sandwich Keepers…they'll be meat in the sandwich baloney …and that's not baloney!

Just Jack Supporting Member of TMP25 Jan 2014 8:21 a.m. PST

For the record, I'm not worried about any of you letting me down, quite the opposite really.

I'm hoping to find you some sandwich meat/baloney tomorrow morning! Tally Hoooooooooooooooooooooooo!

V/R,
Jack

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.