Help support TMP


"The Confederate Ironclad Navy" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Gettysburg Soldiers


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


1,275 hits since 4 Jan 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0104 Jan 2014 10:47 p.m. PST

Interesting article here.

"During the Civil War, the agricultural South faced a daunting opponent in the industrialized North, and nowhere was that more apparent than on water. The Confederacy began the war without a single warship to its name.

The imminent Italian historian Raimondo Luraghi argued in his books The Plantation South and A History of the Confederate Navy that to win, the Confederacy had to industrialize, which it was able to do. Industrialization allowed the South to take advantage of, as well as contribute to, revolutionary changes that were occurring in naval warfare. The Confederacy would combat test mines (torpedoes), submarines, semi-submersibles ( Davids ), and rifled cannon (Brooke guns) during the war. But the modern weapon in which the C.S. Navy initially placed its greatest faith was the armored ship, and by war's end it had commissioned and put into action a veritable fleet of ironclads.

The Confederate ironclads were neither the first commissioned, the first in battle, nor the most advanced. The concept of iron-armored ships was well known by naval officials. French ironclad floating batteries had engaged Russian shore batteries during the Crimean War. And both Great Britain and France had commissioned powerful armored warships by the time the American Civil War broke out…"

Full article here
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP05 Jan 2014 6:56 a.m. PST

That is an incredibly useful web site – I was reading a book by Still in the middle of last year, he knows his stuff.

Ace Link – 5*'s

thumbs up

Tango0105 Jan 2014 3:09 p.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

CampyF07 Jan 2014 2:44 p.m. PST

Thank you. It is amazing how much the Confederates accomplished with so little to work with. I'm planning on acquiring ships for a Stonewall vs. Niagara and Sacramento battle. I may need to expand.

Tango0107 Jan 2014 10:45 p.m. PST

A votre service mon ami.
Good luck with your project!.

Amicalement
Armand

EJNashIII10 Jan 2014 10:38 p.m. PST

While managing to build some ironclad ships, they did not industrialize. The south never created a single new steam engine to power anything. They built a small navy by cannibalizing existing civilian ships or captured ships.

NY Irish03 Feb 2014 6:33 p.m. PST

Jeans hill is right. Putting together some emergency factories as a wartime necessity for 3 years is not industrializing. Once the blockade was in effect they hadn't the means to industrialize, nor the technicians. Creative, yes. Industrial, no.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.