Help support TMP


"photos of minis for rulebook" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Game Design Message Board

Back to the Photography of Miniatures Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Transporting the Simians

How to store and transport an army of giant apes?


Featured Workbench Article

Christmas Figures from Amazon Miniatures

These are not the seasonal figures that you might give your mother to put on the shelf!


Featured Profile Article

Introducing Editor Katie

Our newest staff editor introduces herself.


Current Poll


1,487 hits since 31 Dec 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

doc mcb31 Dec 2013 5:29 p.m. PST

I'm taking photos to include in BLOODY DAWN (Alamo). As a matter of aesthetics versus recognition of reality (i.e. these are toys on a tabletop, not real soldiers in battle) do folks prefer:

1) as far as possible, conceal the bases and movement trays. using flocking etc to hide straight lines, try to make the photo look like the real thing;

OR

2) take a nice photo of a GAME being played, without worrying about the fact that the miniatures are mounted on bases with lots of unrealistic straight lines visible?

I own hundreds of old WARGAMES ILLUSTRATED and, while I am no professional photographer, I can work towards that standard.

On the other hand, no wargame actually played ever looks like one of their covers, even if we DO remove the dice and the coffee cups.

So what's a reasonable standard for photos illustrating a game in progress, to be included in the rules book?

KnightTemplarr31 Dec 2013 5:42 p.m. PST

Can you do both without it being a problem?

You can do some eye candy shots to make the book look good.

You can do some more unobstructed shots for illustration for mechanics.


Doc Happy New Year to you and David and families.
I hope Splintered Light makes it back to Hurrioon or Recon soon.

Pictors Studio31 Dec 2013 5:55 p.m. PST

I agree with Knighttemplarr. A mix of both would be nice. I do like the shots of the figures with the bases blurred into the back ground but then for some shots it would be nice to see that they are figures.

If they are big battle scenes blurring would be best though.

doc mcb31 Dec 2013 6:20 p.m. PST

Thanks, KT. Which cons we do is up to David, and primarily a function of his day job and limited number of days off.

Yes, I can do some of both. I agree that eye candy is dandy (but liquor is quicker).

Rudi the german31 Dec 2013 7:30 p.m. PST

2 for sure…. I want to see the game played by the desinger.. Meaning it is playtested… No faked photos for me please.

doc mcb31 Dec 2013 8:12 p.m. PST

Yes, that is a good point. Best way to take pics is during a game.

Griefbringer01 Jan 2014 4:09 a.m. PST

For a game rulebook, I would prefer the pictures to look like they have been taken from actual game situations.

That said, for photos in particularly central locations (like in the cover) you might want to do a few "diorama" style shots where the bases are less visible and maybe the setting is more dramatic looking than you could expect from a usual game.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP01 Jan 2014 6:06 a.m. PST

Definitely decide the type of pic by function.

Consider either an drawing (possibly as abstract as a sport X's and O's diagram) or a pic from play to illustrate important rules points.

Nice pics should function as filler to help you with pagination and alignment.

doc mcb01 Jan 2014 6:27 a.m. PST

Everyone seems to agree that a case-by-case mixture is best. Makes a lot of sense. Thanks.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.