"Carronades in wargames?" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Age of Sail Message Board
Areas of InterestRenaissance 18th Century Napoleonic 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleA fourth set of Romanian villagers from Blue Moon's boxed set.
Featured Workbench ArticleDervel returns from Mexico with a new vision for making palm trees from scratch.
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
TelesticWarrior | 17 Dec 2013 4:20 a.m. PST |
Hi everyone, I'm still relatively new to Napoleonic Naval and I am a little bit confused as to the nature of carronade guns, especially from a wargaming perspective. I think I am correct when I say that they had a reduced range but I am not sure when exactly they were used. I've been reading that they were positioned on the top deck but now I am confused by learning that some ships only had carronades and used them for broadsides too. I suppose my specific questions would be; 1. can the carronades fire forward and aft, as opposed to to the sides of the ship? 2. Do you normally fire them seperately in games, or are they factored into the main gunnery roll? 3. Do you bother noting how many carronade guns each ship has in your Orders of Battle? I guess the answer to this will depend on the answers to questions 1 & 2. Note; To start off with I am using the "Beat to quarters" free rules, which seem excellent to me as they are a good mix of fast play and detail. These rules allow carronades to fire 4 hexes (as opposed to the usual 13), but they are not clear as to whether they are fired in addition to the main broadside, or whether they are more vicious than the ordinary fire, or what direction they can fire.
|
Dark Knights And Bloody Dawns | 17 Dec 2013 4:27 a.m. PST |
|
batesmotel34 | 17 Dec 2013 5:40 a.m. PST |
See the wikipedia entry en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carronade. Basically carronades were roughly 1/4-1/3 the wieght of a normal full size naval gun. They were fired with a much lighter charge than a normal naval gun but due to more precise manufacutring and reduced windage were still quite effective at shorter ranges. They could be served by smaller crews than a full size gun and be reloaded and fired more rapidly. Chris |
marcus arilius | 17 Dec 2013 8:51 a.m. PST |
|
Pyrate Captain | 17 Dec 2013 9:13 a.m. PST |
They were not counted in gun complement of the vessel. The advantage, once in range was a reduced crew to operate. They fired similar rounds to the long guns. The trade-off for reduced crew appears to be accuracy and range. |
Mark Barker | 17 Dec 2013 5:04 p.m. PST |
The main advantage of carronades was that they allowed the normally light upper deck armament to be supplemented or replaced by guns firing much heavier shot – 18, 24 or 32 pounders which would be impossible to mount normally. (Victory's 68-pdrs were something of an oddball
) The short barrels limited muzzle velocity and effective range but created a close range boost to firepower invaluable at yardarm range – hence the nickname "smasher". As previously stated they could also be served by a smaller gun-crew, invaluable if you were strapped for people such as a merchantman (where the carronade was first used) and the perenially overstreched Royal Navy. Mark Barker The Inshore Squadron |
dantheman | 30 Dec 2013 8:48 p.m. PST |
The Essex had almost all carronades. It cost her in the end when the RN finally caught up with her and pounded her at long range. Captain Porter complained about not having enough long guns, but the US navy didn't do anything about it. |
Volunteer | 31 Dec 2013 12:29 a.m. PST |
HMS Glatton was another ship with all carronades. |
|