Help support TMP


"Shore Based Interference In The Regia Marina?" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two at Sea

Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Action Stations !


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Back to Paper Modeling - with the Hoverfly

The Editor returns to paper modeling after a long absence.


Featured Book Review


788 hits since 2 Dec 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Cuchulainn02 Dec 2013 6:37 a.m. PST

Erich Raeder was forever meddling with his commanders at sea, trying to micromanage how they would fight their ships and react to a situation, and quick to fire those he deemed had not carried out his orders to the letter. I'm just curious to know if the Italian Supermarina would have interfered in a similar manner with the operations of the Regia Marina?

I have tried to find something on this online, but with no success, and my books on the RM are few and far between. Mind you, I can see Santa bringing me a copy of Mussolini's Navy… :o)

dragon6 Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2013 6:51 p.m. PST

I would say not, because the commanders were cautioned sufficently to know losses were unacceptable before they sailed.

Fleet in being was the mantra of Supermaria. They were actually pretty successful at it.

zippyfusenet02 Dec 2013 7:14 p.m. PST

Fleet in being = fleet in port.

Because a critical fuel shortage hamstrung the Italian war effort, heavy units of the Italian fleet rarely were able to sortie, but had to spend most of their war at anchor. What little fuel was available was allocated mostly to the cargo ships and their escorts that attempted to run supplies and reinforcements across the Sicilian Narrows to the Axis armies in North Africa.

On the rare occasions when the Italian battle fleet put to sea, Commando Supremo did not directly interfere with operations. However, at the battle of Cape Spartivento, general orders required Admiral Iachino only to engage if he had a numeric advantage. Having no clear advantage, he withdrew.

valerio10 Dec 2013 8:01 a.m. PST

Actually Supermarina intefered quite often, as it was formally the commanding authority even superior to the commander at sea.

The rationale behind this was that Supermarina centralized all the info coming from other sources (Aeronautica, local command in autonomous zones such as EGEOMIL, the Germans, etc.) and therefore had a bigger and better picture of the situation tha the commander at sea.

Therefore the commander at sea was constantly exchanging messages with Supermarina, receiving orders more or less open to intepretation. This created much problems as commanders at sea were often incapable of taking autonomous decisions, having to wait for Supermarina's directives, and tended to err on the safe side when the situation was not clear as they we conscious that Supermarina would have been ready to scapegoat them in case of failure.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.