Help support TMP


"Ironclads" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Media Message Board

Back to the ACW Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Once Upon a Time in the West


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


Featured Workbench Article

Building Langton's 1/1200 Scale U.S.S. Cumberland

David Conyers of Aire Brush Painting Service tells how he builds and paints 1/1200 scale ACW ship.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Minairons' 1:600 Xebec

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at a fast-assembly naval kit for the Age of Sail.


1,637 hits since 4 Nov 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0104 Nov 2013 9:00 p.m. PST

By E. Simpson, Commodore U.S.N.

"The term applies to all vessels clad with iron for defense. The introduction of iron armor for the protection of ships is of very recent date. Formerly, as we find by allusions in history, there had been instances where efforts were made to protect the sides of ships by timber or hides, but these seem to have been isolated cases due to the ideas of some individual commander. With the artillery that was in use in the 15th, 16th, and 17th centuries there was no call for any aid in the defense of ships, and the term "wooden walls" conveyed the idea of an all-sufficient protection; and the correctness of the idea is sufficiently apparent when we refer to the actions of such commanders as Blake and Van Tromp being continued day after day, and being finally closed without definite result.

In the 18th century artillery had become much more formidable, but it was not until early in the 19th century that any definite shape was given to the idea of protecting the sides of a ship from the fire of an enemy; and even when it was first seriously proposed it met with great disfavor, and has had to fight its way against determined opposition and prejudice.

Thomas Gregg, of Pennsylvania, is given the credit of the first definite proposition for an ironclad vessel in 1813, but no decided step in developing the subject was taken until Mr. Stevens, of New York, made his contract with the U. S. government in 1843 for the construction of an armed vessel…"

picture

picture

Full article here
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

John the Greater05 Nov 2013 7:52 a.m. PST

Very interesting, thanks.

Unfortunately, nothing on the Brazilian ironclads. Oh well, I guess I have specialized tastes.

Tango0105 Nov 2013 11:05 a.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed the article my friend.
If you want… I would search for you… (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

Tango0105 Nov 2013 11:13 a.m. PST

Oh!. I can not with my genius!…

link

link

link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

John the Greater06 Nov 2013 7:24 a.m. PST

Muchas gracias, mi amigo!

Tango0106 Nov 2013 10:29 a.m. PST

Siempre un placer ayudarte amigo mio!. (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.