Help support TMP


"Sexy Dropship material from FW" Topic


36 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 15mm Sci-Fi Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Tin Soldiers in Action


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Making Zed

Sometimes, you've just got to have that special figure...


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Final Faction Figures

Want to game with 4" action figures, at an affordable price point?


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


2,954 hits since 25 Sep 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
AWuuuu25 Sep 2013 10:05 a.m. PST

picture

Great looks, great size, minor conversions only
Unfortunately price attached make me sad cosmic panda..

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP25 Sep 2013 10:12 a.m. PST

What's "sexy" about it? Trust me, of whatever can be labeled "sexy" in this world, a wargaming model is not on that list.

But it is a well done piece of kit for an SF tabletop.

khurasanminiatures25 Sep 2013 10:14 a.m. PST

sex·y (sks)
adj. sex·i·er, sex·i·est
1. Arousing or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest.
2. Slang Highly appealing or interesting; attractive: "The recruiting brochures are getting sexier" (Jack R. Wentworth).
sexi·ly adv.
sexi·ness n.

AWuuuu25 Sep 2013 10:16 a.m. PST

Grammarnazi vs grammar freedomfighter all in my thread and one of them is producing my favorite miniatures too :P

PS: Honestly don't know what were you looking for in sexy picture thread on TMP.. Its either chick from THW commercials or miniatures :>

The Beast Rampant25 Sep 2013 10:18 a.m. PST

That particular use of the word is not heard much at all in the States.

Underfire Wargaming25 Sep 2013 10:30 a.m. PST

LOL, great post Khurasan XD!

Pictors Studio25 Sep 2013 10:32 a.m. PST

"That particular use of the word is not heard much at all in the States."

It is used like that all the time in Pennsylvania.

Mako1125 Sep 2013 10:41 a.m. PST

While the general layout is decent, I can't say I'm a fan of the final design.

It's a bit too busy looking for me.

Sloppypainter25 Sep 2013 10:44 a.m. PST

Nice paint job, though.

darthfozzywig25 Sep 2013 10:48 a.m. PST

Very cool. I won't even bother looking at the price tag, however. :)

Delta Vee25 Sep 2013 10:50 a.m. PST

and not a single aerofoil was seen that day…..
:(

15mm and 28mm Fanatik25 Sep 2013 10:50 a.m. PST

Since when did FW do 15's?

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP25 Sep 2013 11:07 a.m. PST

2. Slang Highly appealing or interesting; attractive: "The recruiting brochures are getting sexier" (Jack R. Wentworth).

Oh, yes. I know it's buzzword talk. Doesn't make this usage any less moronic, cliché or banal. And using the dean of a business school as a usage example doesn't diminish the accuracy of that assessment one whit.

khurasanminiatures25 Sep 2013 11:14 a.m. PST

Well, you may not like the usage, but that doesn't mean it can't be labelled sexy.

SpleenRippa25 Sep 2013 11:22 a.m. PST

What does this (well painted) shoebox have to do with 15mm SF?

morrigan25 Sep 2013 11:40 a.m. PST

"one whit" – now you're just showing off. ;-)

fullerena25 Sep 2013 12:40 p.m. PST

If I had to guess, the reason this is here is because it's a rubbish small fighter… thing, but in 15mm it'd be a good base for a larger dropship or transport. £95.00 GBP is a wee bit much for something you're hacking the guns off of though.

Unless you're mad.

…which I suppose means someone just ordered two to convert.

Parzival, sexy is perfectly cromulent slang for something, although I wouldn't rate this as a slice of fried gold.

and not a single aerofoil was seen that day…..

Blame the Imperium. They're all a bit thick, so if you put a space marine or navy pilot in a brick with engines they'll say the prayers, smoke the incense and fly around all day quite happily.

Now, a proper orky design wouldn't stand for that. Any ork knows a plane's gotta have proper wings, and if a mek tried to pass this off as a plane they'd laugh and krump 'im.

The ork plane may not USE the wings, especially if they came off during a ram and the engines were powerful enough to put a thousand ton cube of iron in orbit, but no self-respecting ork would fly one.

Not like those imperials. No self-respect at all.

Cacique Caribe25 Sep 2013 12:43 p.m. PST

AWuuuu,

One person's "grammar freedomfighter" is another's grammar terrorist.

Dan

Gokiburi25 Sep 2013 1:22 p.m. PST

As someone who once had a *very* special dream about an Sdkfz 222, I feel that I am uniquely qualified to use the first definition of sexy to describe miniatures. guinness

AWuuuu25 Sep 2013 1:27 p.m. PST

Like with everything Cacique Caribe :)

I am looking for larger kind of dropship. Company infantry+ vehicle size. So I like this frame. Large dropships are seriously lacking in 15 mm and even if they are converted, despite great effort still look mostly blobish .

This overpriced piece of resin is easy job. Drop the guns add ramp in front and she will deploy in combat situation !

And for a GW Space marine vehicle this one is incredibly aerodynamic and under gunned/ underskulled :)

CPBelt25 Sep 2013 1:37 p.m. PST

Keeps to the boxy 40K look. Fine by me.

I have 150 freshmen and sophomore essays and 75 literature exams sitting on my desk at the college waiting to be graded. Last thing I need to is get into a grammar/usage battle!

However, I will throw my forces in with Khurasan's Lexicographer Legions. grin

Covert Walrus25 Sep 2013 2:06 p.m. PST

This version of the Storm Eagle apparently sacrifices all its cargo capacity for firepower and ammunition, according to the psigram I received this morning on the topic. So it's more a dropgunship than a true dropship.

victor0leto25 Sep 2013 3:00 p.m. PST

Don't you need a visa to visit Pennsylvania?, well, the western half anyway

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP25 Sep 2013 3:21 p.m. PST

"The difference between the almost right word & the right word is really a large matter--it's the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning." --- Mark Twain

28mmMan25 Sep 2013 3:50 p.m. PST

Maybe an alternate starter…the GI Joe Sand Serpent/Night Raven …online sites have them in the $25 USD-$45 range…certainly some higher but many lower.

picture

20" x 13" so it has some size…which allows for the inclusion of a drop box under the carriage :D

Mako1125 Sep 2013 5:34 p.m. PST

Only $160 USD?

Must be on sale.

WLBartlett25 Sep 2013 5:40 p.m. PST

On sale or Epic scale…

War Monkey25 Sep 2013 7:15 p.m. PST

1. Arousing or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest.

And you wonder why people thing gamers are werid and lonely guys, tucked away in our little rooms, painting away and admiring each others handy work

Pictors Studio25 Sep 2013 7:26 p.m. PST

"And you wonder why people thing (sic) gamers are werid and lonely guys, tucked away in our little rooms, painting away and admiring each others handy work"

Probably they think that because some of us don't know the second definition of sexy.

twogunsblazing26 Sep 2013 3:10 a.m. PST

Yeah, its pretty sexy!!! I reckon if you used some plasticard to cover up the areas where you removed weapons from and to also add some extra supporting structure to the cockpit windshield to make it appear to be a smaller scale, then it would serve well as a 15mm scale dropship.

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP26 Sep 2013 4:46 a.m. PST

Probably they think that because some of us don't know the second definition of sexy.

Oh please. If you're going to criticize my point, criticize my point. Ad hominem gets you nowhere in my book.

I fully understand that "sexy" has become a marketing buzzword designed to sell products which have nothing whatsoever to do with sexual attractiveness, and thus has fallen into the common lexicon as a generic term of appeal applied to virtually any object or idea. I just believe that such usage is weak, lazy and banal (not to mention somewhat stupid), and that "sexy" should be reserved for its original meaning, in which the word actually retains its effectiveness.

I'm a writer, not a grammarian. I do not object to the usage based upon definition, but upon the banality of it. In short, as my quote was intended to convey, find a better word.

Especially as 40K has got to be among the least sexually attractive activities on the planet.

Unless, of course, you're a girl who plays 40K, in which case male players will be stumbling over their models to talk with you,* in the irrational belief that stories of their tabletop prowess will cause you to consent to a date.

Augustus26 Sep 2013 9:08 a.m. PST

Cool ship.

I'd make the following changes:

  • Remove the twin rotary cannon on the front. A rotary cannon's job is best done alone. See also A-10
  • Cut the interior twin-bolter from each sponson so the turrets can traverse forwards.
  • Remove the missile pods in the wings OR give them some sort of cover
  • Remove horns from either side of the cockpit; replace with single pitot tube construct and perhaps a refueling drogue
  • Then decide to build the whole thing out of foamcore. For 160 smackers…you could get a lot of offshelf parts for this….

Heinz Good Aryan26 Sep 2013 11:13 a.m. PST

"Oh please. If you're going to criticize my point, criticize my point. Ad hominem gets you nowhere in my book."

um, he was responding to someone else, not to you. he even quoted the guy he was responding to!

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP26 Sep 2013 12:07 p.m. PST

Okay, fair enough. Guess I'm getting a mite testy these days. In a radical departure from the societal norm, I blame myself.

I will say that if an object not related to sex is to be described as sexy, I would suggest something like this:

picture

or this:

picture

or this:

picture

or this:

picture

Why? Because they have sweeping, curvy lines, and sleek, smooth skin, like a beautiful woman… and I shan't go further with that.

But whatever can be said about GW/Forge World's vehicle designs, they are none of the above. So of all the words that can be used for the things they produce, good or bad, "sexy" ain't one of 'em.

TheBeast Supporting Member of TMP26 Sep 2013 12:45 p.m. PST

Maybe an alternate starter…the GI Joe Sand Serpent/Night Raven

Keep looking in thrift stores; I've found at least two of the old Ravens. Interestingly, I had thought about using the first as an objective in a very old 40K Necromund-ish game scenario. Standing on it's tail. ;->=

Have to admit, that Sand Serpent looks a better conversion fodder.

Doug

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP27 Sep 2013 5:57 a.m. PST

By the way, I should have attached a caveat to my above images: I'm pretty certain that men are really the only creatures who find the above objects "sexy."

After considerable research, thought, and exploration of my "feminine side" (yes, I was willing to do that for you guys), I have determined that, setting aside attire (which of course is intended to attract the male gender), the objects which women find the most "sexy" are the following:

picture

Preferably when found in a man's wallet.
evil grin
(Ducks and runs for cover…)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.