Help support TMP


"House Panel Shoves Pentagon-China Satellite..." Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

MEA Infantry Squad [BEvo]

The Editor snaps some photos of the pre-painted Middle Eastern infantry from Mongoose's new game, Battlefield Evolution.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Hasslefree's Not Hot Fuzz Nick & Sam

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian tackles two subjects from his favorite sculptor.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


491 hits since 21 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP21 May 2013 12:23 p.m. PST

… Deal Out of the Airlock.

"…The deal underscores how desperate the U.S. military is for satellite bandwidth, especially in relatively remote locations. But the lease still doesn't sit well with many House Republicans, who see China as a global competitor to the U.S., not a military partner. (In the last day, American officials have accused Chinese hackers of breaking into Google to get U.S. surveillance targets and restarting a military operation aimed at cleaning out America's companies of their trade secrets.) Pentagon officials say they're satisfied that any data passed through the Apstar-7 is properly encrypted and therefore protected from potential eavesdropping by Beijing. The congressmen are worried that the Chinese could just shut down access to the satellite altogether.

The contract "exposes our military to the risk that China may seek to turn off our ‘eyes and ears' at the time of their choosing," Rep. Mike Rogers said in a statement shortly after the deal was revealed during an April hearing of the strategic forces panel.

The provision gives the Defense Secretary a bit of wiggle room on future satellite deals with China. But only a bit. The Secretary could waive the prohibition — but only if he and the Director of National Intelligence submit an unclassified report justifying the waiver. Of course, such a justification would immediately be held up as an example of the U.S. government's failure to adequately provide for its forces.

The partial satellite ban is one of several new items in the bill aimed at Beijing, as tensions between the two nations continue to bubble unevenly. The congressmen are also demanding reports from the Pentagon on China's emerging missile defense capabilities and on technologies allegedly transferred from NASA to People's Republic. They want to be notified within 48 hours if there's been an "attempt by a foreign actor to disrupt, degrade, or destroy a U.S. national security space capability." (Earlier this month, the Chinese reportedly tested a new anti-satellite missile.) And they'd like the Secretaries of State and Defense to "secure the cooperation of the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China to verifiably reduce the spread of technology and expertise that supports the ballistic missile programs" of Syria, Iran, and North Korea. (Chinese tech has allegedly wound up in all three of the rogue regimes' arsenals.)…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP22 May 2013 10:35 a.m. PST

Some problems to post this one. (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.