Help support TMP


"Attack Vector: Tactical - First face-to-face game!" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The Editor's 1st Grey Knights Figure [40K]

A small step for Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, a big step for his Grey Knights.


Featured Workbench Article

Dentatus: A Chance to Paint Something Scary?

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian paints a couple of mean-looking mutant-type villains from the far future.


Featured Book Review


1,684 hits since 15 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Red Trotsky Red15 May 2013 12:54 p.m. PST

I have just posted an illustrated account of my first face to face game of AV:T over at BoardGameGeek boardgamegeek.com/article/12306276#12306276

SBminisguy15 May 2013 1:39 p.m. PST

Thanks! I don't have AV:T, but I do have Squadron Strike -- any idea how they compare??

DesertScrb15 May 2013 5:40 p.m. PST

What's most impressive is that you got your significant other to play this with you!

emckinney15 May 2013 9:40 p.m. PST

SBminisguy, they're surprisingly different, in large part because AV:T breaks game turns down into eight segments. There's very little range band jumping, you see your pivots go window by window, you get to react segment-by-segment, and so forth. Importantly, how often a weapon can fire is measured in segments, not turns. The Rafik's 3MRLSes can fire every fifth segment, while the Wasp's 4SRLSes fire every eight segments (one full turn). This means that you can't just compare weapons on how much damage they can do in one shot, since those medium range lasers fire almost twice as often as the short range lasers. (Differences can be a lot more subtle, though.)

Power and heat are another difference. In Squadron Strike, you generate Action Points with Bridge or Auxiliary Reactor boxes; some weapons need APs to fire, or to use special traits, etc. In AV:T:

Batteries power weapons
Reactors recharge batteries
Reactors generate waste heat that has to be stored in heat sinks
Radiators can dissipate heat from radiators (very slow, and not when you thrust or pivot, and they take a full turn to extend before you can use them, and a full turn to retract after using them, and they get hit automatically if in range of enemy weapons … so they don't get used a lot)

When your heat sinks reach capacity, you start overheating your ship, which causes increasing problems. It's both realistic and a bit like Battletech. The result is a "heat clock" on combats. You can only run the reactors so long before the ship overheats, which means that you can only generate so much energy before the ship overheats, which means that you can only power your weapons so many times before your ship overheats.

Check out David's other recent posts as "TrotskyTrotsky" on the BGG page for AV:T
link
and his videos
link

You can download the tutorial pack and try it for yourself: link

tkdguy15 May 2013 10:35 p.m. PST

Nice AAR!

SBminisguy16 May 2013 7:32 a.m. PST

@emckinney, thanks for the comparison. Which one do you prefer, if you had your choice of which rules to play?

emckinney16 May 2013 10:29 a.m. PST

I'm probably the wrong person to ask, since I did a lot of work on AV:T and I haven't played a lot of Squadron Strike. I should have mentioned that AV:T is purely vector movement ("Mode 3"), while Squadron Strike handles "Whoosh!" Star Wars-style movement and the sort of "I pick my speed for this turn" movement seen in Star Fleet Battles, Star Cruiser (for 2300AD), and others. You probably knew that, though.

I adore AV:T. :)

emckinney16 May 2013 11:26 p.m. PST

picture

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.