Help support TMP


"DNA Indicates Minoan Origin" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Ancient and Medieval Wargaming


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Hoplites

Another week, another unit for the Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Groundcloths & Battlesheets

Wargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.


1,324 hits since 15 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian15 May 2013 8:58 a.m. PST

Europe's first advanced civilisation was local in origin and not imported from elsewhere, a study says….

link

elsyrsyn15 May 2013 9:05 a.m. PST

Interesting stuff. But I wonder about the possible distinction between the native Cretans and the ruling class, which I have read in some places was composed primarily of immigrants from elsewhere. 37 bodies in a cave might be imported aristocrats, or they might be lower status natives. I'd be interested to hear about what sorts of grave goods were found in the tomb, etc. in order to try and infer something about the status of the dead.

Doug

WCTFreak15 May 2013 10:23 a.m. PST

Then why is the Linea A that diffrent from Linea B and other indoeuropean Languages ?

zippyfusenet15 May 2013 2:36 p.m. PST

The population showed particular genetic affinities with Bronze Age populations from Sardinia and Iberia and Neolithic samples from Scandinavia and France…

The authors therefore conclude that the Minoan civilisation was a local development, originated by inhabitants who probably reached the island around 9,000 years ago, in Neolithic times.

9,000 years ago was pre-Indo-European expansion. The Scandinavian and French Neolithic was pre-Indo-European. Europe was inhabited before the coming of the Indo-Europeans.

One non-Indo-European population that survives in Europe is the Basques, who may once have lived in more of ancient Iberia. The Etruscans may have been another group of non-Indo-European speakers, who may have been related to early Aegean and Tyrhenian peoples, possibly to Sardinians (Shardana/Sherden).

I think we still can't read Linear A, so we don't know what language it is.

But I wonder about the possible distinction between the native Cretans and the ruling class, which I have read in some places was composed primarily of immigrants from elsewhere.

It appears that Mycenaeans took over Crete after the Minoan collapse. The Mycenaeans were Greek-speakers, so Indo-European. Their records were in Linear B.

The Peleset/Pelishtim(/Pelasgians?) are called 'the remnant of Caphtor'. Caphtor = Crete. They brought Aegean pottery to the coast of Canaan. After settling their Pentapolis, they assimilated and took up the local Semitic language. It would be very interesting to learn what language they spoke at the time they migrated.

spontoon15 May 2013 4:28 p.m. PST

Very good argument Zippyfusenet! I tend to disbelieve the whole Adam & Eve in Africa theory of human development anyway. The diversity in human beings tends to indicate parthenogenesis to me.

The Greek/Mycenean era in Crete is almost documented, yet there was a flourishing culture there before that time.

I feel a lot of early twentieth century and late nineteenth century archaeologists, even up to Leakey; were more concerned with trying to make human pre-history fit the Bible than discover the truth.

But then I once wrote an essay espousing the idea that the five groups of The Sea Peoples in Egypt were actually the tribes of the Five Nations Confederacy. It's not far philologically from Ekwesh to Iroquois!

elsyrsyn15 May 2013 7:11 p.m. PST

I was actually thinking of such a distinction pre-Mycenaean conquest, but it's entirely possible I'm mixing up my eras.

Doug

zippyfusenet16 May 2013 3:56 a.m. PST

It's not far philologically from Ekwesh to Iroquois!

Touche.

nnascati Supporting Member of TMP16 May 2013 1:42 p.m. PST

There are a number of Native American words surviving, especially here in the Philadelphia area, that are tantalizingly similar to words found in Peleset, Meswesh and other Bronze Age cultures.

zippyfusenet16 May 2013 1:59 p.m. PST

Nick, I love ya bro, but we don't even know what language(s) most of the Sea Peoples spoke.

As spontoon was teasing me above, random words in different languages (seperated by > 3000 years and continents and oceans of geography!) that sound kinda alike happen a lot and mean very little.

If all we had to go on was that Peleset sounds kinda like Pelishtim, that wouldn't be much. But we have Aegean pottery (not Early Woodland) from the Philistine Pentapolis, and Judean writings to supplement the Egyptian records. I think we're justified in drawing that connection. Others (/Pelasgians?) are more tenuous.

zippyfusenet16 May 2013 2:05 p.m. PST

What's exciting about this news is that it rules out the Egyptians and other North Africans as progenitors of Minoan civilization, an idea that previously had some legs.

I am curious about North African influence on the early Mediterranean. I wonder, on no particular evidence, whether languages and cultures related to modern Berber/Amazigh once had wider currency in Malta, Sicily, Iberia. I wonder.

nnascati Supporting Member of TMP16 May 2013 3:15 p.m. PST

Irv,
Seriously, we have place names around here like Wyalusing, Manayunk, Passayunk etc. that look surprisingly familiar from Bronze Age names.

zippyfusenet16 May 2013 4:40 p.m. PST

Those are beautiful old Indian names, Delaware I think. What Bronze Age names strike you as similar?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.