Help support TMP


"The Dambusters raid: How effective was it?" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
World War Two in the Air

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Marines to the Ukraine!

When you have several hundred Marines that need painting, who do you call?


Featured Profile Article

WWII in the Clouds

Musings on the aesthetics of tabletop flight...


1,970 hits since 15 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Huscarle15 May 2013 1:50 a.m. PST

An interesting article on the Dambusters Raid, and much more than just a propaganda boost.
link

Rapier Miniatures15 May 2013 2:27 a.m. PST

If you want to know the havoc the dams raids caused, look at the effects in early 1945 when the Germans opened the sluice gates of these same Dams to flood the Area that the British and Americans prepared to attack.

Big Martin Back15 May 2013 3:31 a.m. PST

Whilst the dams were fairly quickly rebuilt, the power station at the Mohne was not reopened until post war. A lot of effort was expended – concrete, labour, AA guns – that would have been useful elsewhere and it put the Germans on notice that they weren't invulnerable.
Some German friends of mine lived in the area of the Eder dam at the time and it certainly frightened them.

Mapleleaf15 May 2013 5:51 a.m. PST

You also have to take into consideration the effect had on morale and the prestige of Bomber Command at the time. The Dambusters movie show some of this . The fact that we are still talking about the raid 60 years after the event shows that there are factors other than physical damage have to be taken into consideration when judging effectiveness.

troopwo Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2013 6:39 a.m. PST

No one would have schemed up a raid as ridiculous as this without having a good reason behind it.

Electricity production, industrial disruption, industrial re-allocation, worker disruption, defense re-allocation.

Flat out I'ld hazard a guess of two to three months complete loss of production for key sections of the Ruhr. Long term disruption more likely as nine months to a year. As has been said already, the Mohne damand station not rebuilt until after the war.

Great War Ace15 May 2013 7:53 a.m. PST

What I don't understand is why the Brits didn't mount another raid on the rebuilt dams. Was the info about the effect of the raid not encouraging enough? A score of bombers puts the Ruhr into complete chaos for weeks/months, using up huge amounts of manpower and resources to repair the damage, and the entire thing could go for nothing by simply busting the dams again. But that never happened. Why?…

mjkerner15 May 2013 7:55 a.m. PST

And despite the raid's audacity, pluck, heroism, damage to the facilities, and positive effect on Bomber Command, the movie remake's (Spielberg, I think??) likely effect on today's audience will be a furor over what to call the dog.

If they can't use the real name, then my vote is for "Niger".

David Manley15 May 2013 9:22 a.m. PST

Or Niggle

Littlearmies15 May 2013 11:48 a.m. PST

Evidently it is a toss up between "Nigsy" and "Digger."

Having just finished "The Red Line" by John Nichol about the Nuremburg raid of March 30th / 31st 1944 when 95 Lancaster and Halifax bombers were lost for no military advantage whatsoever, I think it it is clear the raid was worth the effort.

I'd love to see the ten full size Lancasters they've built for the film, though.

GarrisonMiniatures15 May 2013 12:52 p.m. PST

Wonder how many guns and personnel the raid caused the Germans to move to places they didn't really want to put them?

coopman15 May 2013 4:06 p.m. PST

GMT Games just announced a solitaire game about these raids in their newsletter today.

spontoon15 May 2013 5:12 p.m. PST

Why not just leave the damn dog out of the movie!

Huscarle16 May 2013 4:07 a.m. PST

Another link showing the journey & incidents (who crashed where, etc), plus radio commentary from some of those involved.
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22544567

Chouan16 May 2013 12:11 p.m. PST

Bomber Harris thought the raid a waste of resources, the damage was extensive, but essentially limited, and nearly all the casualties on the ground were Russian slave labourers. Although some economic resources were briefly dislocated, the damage wasn't anything like as bad as has been suggested, and no effort was made to interdict the repair work, which would have been a relatively simple task, with minimal use of resources. Repeat attacks would have prolonged the repair work and encouraged the relocation of far more resources, both Flak and everything else necessary. All in all a rather depressing waste of life, and I'm not sure that the British public were quite as impressed as was thought.

Littlearmies16 May 2013 3:55 p.m. PST

Chouan – Bomber Harris thought that anything that didn't involve carpet bombing German city centres was a waste of resources – including interdicting railways during the D-Day period. On the other hand Albert Speer said it severely disrupted production for several months. And I think all casualties of war a "rather depressing waste of life."

Monophagos16 May 2013 5:16 p.m. PST

I think the British public was very impressed – my Mum danced with Guy Gibson!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.