"Warhammer Historical's Great War rules any good?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War One
Featured Hobby News Article
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.
Featured Book Review
|
| CATMAN2 | 14 May 2013 9:43 a.m. PST |
Looking to get into WW1 – is Warhammer Historical's Great war any good, particularly for 1914? |
| Ceterman | 14 May 2013 9:47 a.m. PST |
I don't know, never read em. But by far the best WW1 rules I've come across by far is TFL Through the Mud and the Blood. Great set of rules for large & small skirmish.
You should give em a try.
Peter |
| lkmjbc3 | 14 May 2013 9:54 a.m. PST |
They are fun skirmish set. We use them for Boxer rebellion. They are perfect for that. They are just a simplified version of 5th edition 40K. Great fun. Joe Collins |
| liborn | 14 May 2013 5:46 p.m. PST |
I use them and really enjoy them! Highly recommend them!!! |
| Lion in the Stars | 14 May 2013 9:21 p.m. PST |
They're not bad, but they're a simplified version of 40k v4 (area terrain rules went away in v5). Fun for a game, not sure how much period flavor they have! |
| McWong73 | 14 May 2013 11:07 p.m. PST |
I liked them a lot, and was dissapointed when that part of the GW empire folded. They had the same level of flavour that FoW has for WW2, which for me means it has some but it's up to the individual players to bring the rest. |
| CATMAN2 | 15 May 2013 3:10 a.m. PST |
thanks guys – very useful! |
|
scratchbuilds another Victorian flying machine.