Help support TMP


"Military involvement in Syria would be mistake - R Gates" Topic


19 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Objective: Keep Clear

Adapting an inexpensive toy to make an objective marker.


Featured Workbench Article

Hasslefree's Morgan & Tony

With clean lines and not a lot of clutter, Minidragon Fezian says these figures are a painter's dream!


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,018 hits since 12 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Deadone12 May 2013 5:13 p.m. PST

Former Secretary of Defence, Robert Gates, has come out stating that any military involvement in Syria would be a mistake.

He also said involvement in Libya was a mistake – he resigned not long after Libyan affair which was an Anglo-French led operation.

arabnews.com/news/451361

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP12 May 2013 5:51 p.m. PST

It would be a huge mistake to support one 15mm faction over another 15mm faction, when none of them are likely to play by the rules you use.

Striker12 May 2013 6:09 p.m. PST

But if done in 28mm it would open up possibilities.

Wellspring12 May 2013 6:16 p.m. PST

I only support this scenario if the troops be deployed in the Blue Fez.

Stryderg12 May 2013 6:26 p.m. PST

Actually, this might make a good convention game. A special forces team has infiltrated the city to rescue…somebody important. GM runs the team.

The players represent various factions in a civil war. They each get their own victory conditions (faction A must inflict casualties on faction B, get across the board, reach point x and stay there for 3 turns, escort civilians out of harms way, etc)

If anyone is out of the action for a turn or two, the GM can place random mortar rounds, civilians, or UN troops.

Let the chaos begin!

Mako1112 May 2013 6:44 p.m. PST

15mm skirmish, and 6mm for larger battles.

0mms, when not deploying troops inside the country, which I agree would be a mistake. We'd probably end up with both (pro-Assad, anti-Assad, Iranian, AQ, UN, etc.), or more sides fighting against, shooting, and killing our troops, and wouldn't be able to fight back effectively, due to overly restrictive rules of engagement.

vtsaogames12 May 2013 7:37 p.m. PST

3mm figures only, from Ozdial Ozmy (or however that is spelled). Then you can do 1-1 figure ratio.

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER12 May 2013 7:47 p.m. PST

I would use Future War Commander, what would you guys you.

Lion in the Stars12 May 2013 7:50 p.m. PST

Always Ambush Alley/FoF rules for moderns (or any other period where the real difference between troops is training and morale, not particularly any tech difference, for that matter)

vojvoda12 May 2013 8:24 p.m. PST

AFO operations all over the place who knows some may be going on right now. wink wink

VR
James Mattes

basileus6612 May 2013 10:52 p.m. PST

20mm, definitively. FoF/AA scenario, with a SF team trying to rescue a journalist retained by AQ affiliates. The Special Forces team would have support from anti-AQ militiamen. To spice up the scenario, forces loyal to Assad would also have their own rescue operation in place at the same time (PR operations: they save the journalist, and get some sympathy from Western press)

Chortle Fezian13 May 2013 1:53 a.m. PST

This "news" item is on arabnews.com – a site which has been shown to have a 1/72nd bias time and time again. Arabs = oil = plastics. I small a wumpus.

Wellspring13 May 2013 3:59 a.m. PST

It's a C-O-N…spiracy.

Rod I Robertson13 May 2013 7:33 a.m. PST

If a war moves from pico-armour to 6mm, to 10mm, to 15mm, to 20mm, to 25mm, to 28mm, to ….; is that escalation or scale creep?
Rod Robertson

Milites13 May 2013 2:26 p.m. PST

Similarly, if it starts out as 54mm and goes down to 2mm, is that de-escalation, or deploying forces with a smaller footprint?

Gear Pilot13 May 2013 4:20 p.m. PST

Deploy your 15mm figures on the table, pour on gasoline liberally, light match and run.

Deadone13 May 2013 5:33 p.m. PST

Gaming fig leaf – no US air support for insurgents.

Mako1113 May 2013 10:41 p.m. PST

Unless you get a wag the dog scenario…….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.