Help support TMP


"What killed Stonewall Jackson - interesting article" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Book Review


1,263 hits since 11 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP11 May 2013 12:19 p.m. PST

'Stonewall' Jackson Death: Pneumonia Likely Killed Confederate General, Surgeon Says

link

Ken Portner11 May 2013 12:22 p.m. PST

Hasn't this been known for oh, 150 years…

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP11 May 2013 2:01 p.m. PST

I don't write the articles. I just pass them along. That said I think the dynamics if the combat wound etc is interesting. Moreover, how about a medical time travel story where doctors go back in time to save people and see how that plays out in an alternative time line branch. Doesn't effect our time line but we can see the what ifs etc.

Pictors Studio11 May 2013 2:06 p.m. PST

"Scholars have long questioned whether it was an infection or pneumonia that killed "

Pneumonia is an infection. Typical quality reporting from Huff Post.

Cerberus031111 May 2013 5:03 p.m. PST

I always thought getting shot had alot to do with it. Of course we could go all philosophy on you and state that birth is the leading cause of death…

Generalstoner4911 May 2013 6:11 p.m. PST

As someone who works in the medical field I am going to guess it was a Pulmonary Embolism that killed him. The author even mentioned it. The trauma and most likely the immobility after his amputation leads to a hyper-coaguable state in the blood leading to blood clots. These clots arise in the deep veins of the legs and when they break off they go one of two places… the brain or the lung. In Jackson's case it was probably what killed him if I had to guess.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP11 May 2013 7:11 p.m. PST

Been there, done that, didn't die. My MD friend said, "you were damn lucky."

Dan Beattie11 May 2013 7:24 p.m. PST

I once attended a lecture on the subject by two doctors. They concluded it was a Pulmonary Embolism. As if it matters.

nsolomon9911 May 2013 9:20 p.m. PST

So, supposing he lived and recovered … with him present would Lee have won Gettysburg … or would there have been a Gettysburg?

Generalstoner4912 May 2013 7:16 a.m. PST

Don't think there would have been a Gettysburg… at least not to the level we know it.

HammerHead12 May 2013 7:58 a.m. PST

@ Dan Beattie how long was the lecture?

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP12 May 2013 8:12 a.m. PST

Had he survived his Chancellorsville wounding, he would probably be dead by now anyway.

Redleg22512 May 2013 9:32 a.m. PST

"Of course we could go all philosophy on you and state that birth is the leading cause of death…"

"Those not busy being born are busy dying"
Bob Dylan

vtsaogames12 May 2013 10:29 a.m. PST

To use the style of "The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight", he died of natural causes while being shot and having a limb amputated.

Trajanus13 Jun 2013 6:29 a.m. PST

Of course we could go all philosophy on you and state that birth is the leading cause of death…

Or rather its the start of a process which enables death to occur. Of itself its not a cause its an enabler.

Not the same thing.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.