Help support TMP


"Gordon Rhea's new book " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


Featured Workbench Article

Guilford Courthouse

The modeler himself shows how he paints Guilford Courthouse in 40mm scale.


Featured Profile Article

Music Video: Puebla Pride

Our first attempt at a battle music video.


Featured Book Review


1,862 hits since 10 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Don196210 May 2013 9:29 a.m. PST

Like me, I'm sure many of you are fans of Gordon Rhea. His books on the Overland Campaign are well-researched and highly readable narratives. The last one was published in 2007.

After years of research, he's just released a new book titled LEE'S ARMY DURING THE OVERLAND CAMPAIGN: A NUMERICAL STUDY. Drawing from Southern newspapers as a heretofore under-utilized resource, he has helped to give us a very different understanding of the toll this campaign took on Lee's army.

Link to the publishers' site on this book:
link

Personal logo Der Alte Fritz Supporting Member of TMP10 May 2013 9:47 a.m. PST

It should be noted that Gordon Rhea's contribution consists only of writing the foreward to the book. When I saw your post thread topic, my heart nearly jumped for joy thinking that this would be an announcement of his long-delayed book on the crossing of the James River and the commencement of the Petersburg campaing. Sigh.

The initial confrontation between Union general Ulysses S. Grant and Confederate general Robert E. Lee in Virginia during the Overland Campaign included the pivotal battles of Wilderness, Spotsylvania, and Cold Harbor. Yet this crucial engagement has only recently received the same degree of scrutiny as other Civil War battles. In Lee's Army during the Overland Campaign, Alfred C. Young III makes a significant contribution to that study by providing for the first time accurate information regarding the Confederate side throughout the conflict.

While the strength and casualties in Grant's army remain uncontested, historians know much less about Lee's army because of poor record keeping by the Confederates as well as an inordinate number of missing or lost battle reports. The complexity of the Overland Campaign, which consisted of several smaller engagements in addition to the three main clashes, led to considerable historic uncertainty regarding Lee's army. Significant doubts persist about the army's capability at the commencement of the drive, the amount of reinforcements received, and the total of casualties sustained during the entire campaign and at each of the major battles.

The prevailing narrative depicts Confederates as outstripped nearly two to one and portrays Grant suffering losses at a rate nearly double that of Lee. Many Civil War scholars contend that the campaign proved a clear numerical victory for Lee but a tactical triumph for Grant. Young's decade of research, however, contests that notion with new statistical data.

Through careful and thorough analysis of information compiled from the National Archives and personal estates Young challenges common assumptions about the Overland Campaign, showing clearly that Lee's army stood far larger in strength and size and suffered much higher casualties than previously believed.

rmcaras12 May 2013 4:23 p.m. PST

yes the author is Alfred C. Young III. I have the book.

vtsaogames12 May 2013 7:28 p.m. PST

rmcaras, what is your take on the book?
Good history? Well written? I'm interested.

Don196213 May 2013 8:32 a.m. PST

Sorry about the misinformation. It was not deliberate, but rather hastily typed after getting an email from a friend about the book. Still, the book looks intriguing and worth a further look.

Trajanus29 May 2013 9:40 a.m. PST

ARRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.