Help support TMP


"Rocket Armed British Steamtank" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Gallery Message Board

Back to the Victorian SF Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Mighty Armies: Fantasy


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Mechanoid Army: On Parade

Celebrating a milestone: a 100-point army is complete.


Featured Workbench Article

Simple Magnetic Flight Stands

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes another stab at building a more perfect flight stand.


Featured Profile Article

Music Video: The Bugle Is Broken

It is easy to create multiple versions of songs, based on the same lyrics.


Current Poll


1,485 hits since 9 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP09 May 2013 3:54 p.m. PST

"Our First Stretch Goal will be our second technical reference; Land Fighting Machines and Artillery of the Worlds 1902. This volume concentrates on the various steam powered fighting machines and artillery weapons of the HQC universe…"

link

This digital artwork is real cool!.

link

From main page
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP09 May 2013 9:43 p.m. PST

What about that tank is "steam?" With that profile, it would have to be an internal combustion engine. And the design is too late— it looks like something circa 1936 or even WW2, not 1902. Interesting design, but just not "steamy."

Rapier Miniatures10 May 2013 1:42 a.m. PST

I have to agree, the 2 designs are more pulp/dieselpunk than steam.

tsofian10 May 2013 3:56 a.m. PST

Armand
Thanks for posting this!
Since I designed it I will tell you about the world it comes from

In the hqc universe steam road traction was not made impractical by acts of parliament and was a thriving branch of engineering by mid century. Still produced a market for smaller lighter steam engines and boiler systems.

Thus vehicle use such boilers and a forced draft system. USS Monitor went into action without funnels as she had forced draft.

In hqc there have been steam land vehicles since 1830 and land fighting machines in service since 1870. This means the vehicle in the picture has decades of development behind it. In a way you are very much correct. These vehicles have at least as much comparative development as a tank in 1939 in otl. The technology is very different and the battlefields it is to fight on as well. It is still the product if many years of design development and operational experience.

In hqc the altered timeline has downstream consequences. Technology keeps moving forward from those points. We have tried very hard to keep our tech consistent with the way our universe works.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP10 May 2013 10:23 a.m. PST

A votre service mon ami! (smile).

Congrats for the good work and thanks for the explanation.

Amicalement
Armand

tsofian11 May 2013 7:35 a.m. PST

Armand
Thanks again!

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP11 May 2013 11:05 a.m. PST

A pleasure for me my friend! (smile).

Amicalement
Armand

J Womack 9411 May 2013 12:46 p.m. PST

I am not fond of the box-style launcher, but that's just me. Your opinion may vary (gracious of me, innit?).

tsofian12 May 2013 8:08 a.m. PST

They were really neat castings from Rebel minis. I just couldn't resist them. But a box launcher makes way more sense then racks, troughs or tubes. These would be a fictional rocket of 6 inch caliber, so I can put them in any container. Since in the HQC universe rocketry is far in advance of that same period in OTL (they are using chemical rockets to get into orbit after all) I can see bumping up the launcher technology as well.

Terry

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.