Help support TMP


"Firsts and Lasts - why is it so hard to determine these? " Topic


20 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board

Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
World War One
World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Profile Article

New Gate

sargonII, traveling in the Middle East, continues his report on the gates of Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,301 hits since 6 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

BullDog6906 May 2013 5:58 a.m. PST

Maybe its just me, but I am amazed at how difficult it is to agree on the last time / first time something happened in military history.
The old 'when did the British last wear scarlet?' question comes up every few months. Omdurman is often described as being 'the last time British cavalry charged' – which is clearly untrue when you start reading about the Boer War and even the First World War. I have also see arguments on which was the first jet fighter – the Me262 or the Meteor. I'm sure some of the great minds of TMP can come up with a few more.

Why is it so hard for people to agree on these things, when they 'should' be objective statements of fact, not opinions?

Is it simply different interpretations? (eg. 'x was the last 'big' battle where 'all' the troops wore red, whereas at y, only a few wore red and the rest were in khaki')

Or is national pride involved? (eg. our plane got into service before their plane if you define this as being 'in service with 20 squadrons')

Dynaman878906 May 2013 6:40 a.m. PST

> Is it simply different interpretations? (eg. 'x was the last 'big' battle

That is usually the problem, "big" has no definitive answer. Add to that the misinformation out there and it just gets worse.

myrm1106 May 2013 6:40 a.m. PST

Its because the simple question usually comes from a perspective which includes a bunch of assumptions and the people listening have different assumptions.

A bit like people thinking that double click on an icon means 'open this' in Windows – when it means 'open this in this software of version X, or maybe if you told me earlier something else that reads it' – which for most purposes means the same thing but often enough to catch you means something falls over.

Same thing for the readers – they just use a different metric for the assumptions.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2013 6:50 a.m. PST

I kind of agree with the OP. Sports keeps better records.

On the same line, what is "the largest tank battle in history"?

RazorMind06 May 2013 7:05 a.m. PST

Kursk obviously John :-) hah

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2013 7:07 a.m. PST

Really?
See Time magazine during the 1967 Arab Israeli War, CNN et al during the Gulf wars… et cetera

Black Bull06 May 2013 7:29 a.m. PST

Pre 1990
largest tank battle – Kursk
largest armoured battle – Sinai '73
but were they a group of battles or just one…….

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2013 7:39 a.m. PST

Part of the problem with uniforms comes from paintings, incorrect recollections, a hint in a gov't document that is open to interpretation, a memoir in which things were transposed, etc., all of which conflict with "the truth."

Jemima Fawr06 May 2013 7:59 a.m. PST

If you include Indian cavalry as 'British', the last charge was in 1944, when elements of the 3rd Gwalior Lancers and Jodhpur Lancers charged Japanese troops in order to break into the 'Admin Box' position in Burma.

BullDog6906 May 2013 8:00 a.m. PST

79thPA

Interesting point on incorrect recollections. Let's be honest, every soldier wants to be able to say he fought in the last battle when x occurred, or served in the first campaign where y was used… so maybe this 'self-promotion' adds to the confusion.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP06 May 2013 9:02 a.m. PST

And historians do the same – my book covers the first modern war or the last war between gentlemen, or it foreshadows the dark humor of the War of Jenkins Ear. What's the first "modern" war? Depends on what you call modern, dunnit?

Incidentally, there's no such thing as objective in the sense you mean, so there's that as well.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP06 May 2013 9:04 a.m. PST

And stats are killing sports. What did Mr. Sports do today? Tune in to fine out.

For the first time in league history, a left handed warbler scored twenty-two goals while playing right half-guard, for a team that had at least 11 road games, in a 19 day stretch.

donlowry06 May 2013 9:42 a.m. PST

"Frankly, my dear, I don't give a …"

Phil Hall06 May 2013 10:11 a.m. PST

Well,Bob,this is his fourth at-bat at 3:01 on a Friday with one puffy cloud in the Southwest at 1500 feet and a Sun angle of 57' with an ambient temperature of 62'. He has hit a homerun in those exact conditions. Last time was in 2000 against the same team! I smell another homerun, Tom!

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP06 May 2013 12:20 p.m. PST

The last time the bird logo team played the cow logo team was 1987. Birds won on a last second score in a game for the ages. Of course, none of the players on the bird logo team playing tonight had even been born yet. and the old vet on the cow logo team was 8, and a huge fan of the flaming ball logo team. But based on history I think the bird logo team has the edge.

John Tyson06 May 2013 12:27 p.m. PST

In 1948, Howdy Doody had 48 freckles. One for each U.S. state.

Andy P07 May 2013 4:26 a.m. PST

The british still wear scarlet to this day.

uglyfatbloke07 May 2013 5:37 a.m. PST

R.Mark Davies…was n't aware of this action; where would I find out more?
Incidentally, My wife's Commonwealth Burma army has benefited greatly from many posts you've made here, so many thanks.

Meiczyslaw07 May 2013 7:02 a.m. PST

E.C. — there are useful stats, and then there are RBIs.

And, honestly, it's what keeps me following the game when my team is 8-24, and can't get their new TV station on the air.

Jemima Fawr07 May 2013 9:32 a.m. PST

UFB, I wish I knew! It's only mentioned very fleetingly in various accounts. It doesn't help that both regiments were 'Indian States Forces' – i.e. belonging to Maharajas' private armies rather than the Indian Army proper, so the Indian Army probably had little interest in recording much about the incident. The Horsed Wing of the 3rd Gwalior Lancers was also credited with detecting the Japanese advance on Cox's Bazaar during Operation Ha-Go.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.