Help support TMP


"Target: Patton " Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Battleground: World War II


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Victory as a Campaign System

Can a WWII blockgame find happiness as a miniatures campaign system?


Featured Workbench Article

Marines to the Ukraine!

When you have several hundred Marines that need painting, who do you call?


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,366 hits since 2 May 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP02 May 2013 9:25 p.m. PST

Take some minutes and read this interesting thread from another forum.

link

picture

By the way, they show as much "love" as in our dear TMP (smile).
But their comments are interesting.

What do you think?
Any probability of Target Patton?

Amicalement
Armand

Kaoschallenged02 May 2013 10:03 p.m. PST

A examination of the allegations,
"The death of General George S. Patton
Although the accident and subsequent death of General George S. Patton in December 1945 is beyound the scope of my book about the Netherlands American Military Cemetery in Margraten, I'd like to share my research and comments about an alledged plot on this subject. General Patton is buried at the Luxembourg American Military Cemetery, and is the highest ranking and most famous soldier buried overseas."
link

Personal logo Murphy Sponsoring Member of TMP03 May 2013 6:55 a.m. PST

Wow…started reading the thread and for a moment I thought I was on the Nappy's board on in a conversation here on "Why Historicon should be held at The Host"!!!

wink

Jemima Fawr03 May 2013 8:04 a.m. PST

Did they put radioactive isotopes in his helmet polish?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP03 May 2013 11:36 a.m. PST

Glad you had enjoy the thread boys.
Thanks for the data Robert!.

What's your own opinion about it?

Amicalement
Armand

Phil Hall03 May 2013 2:41 p.m. PST

My Greatuncle claimed he was a medic and attended to Patton after he was shot by a sniper. All those at the site were rounded up and held until they signed papers saying they would not disclose the real cause of death. His service record shows he was in the area of the car crash when it happened. He also claims that Patton was buried overseas to prevent any exhumation of the body. It was a closed casket funeral. The reason for the coverup was the fear that the Russians had assassinated him and disclosure would start another war in Europe. At least that's what he claimed.

Militia Pete03 May 2013 4:05 p.m. PST

Wow

Jemima Fawr03 May 2013 4:53 p.m. PST

About 1 in 5 old British soldiers also claim to have driven Monty/Churchill.

By John 5406 May 2013 5:28 a.m. PST

A sniper would have an easy head shot on Patton, given the size of it.

John

Chortle Fezian15 May 2013 4:34 a.m. PST

Nick I love the adolescent smugness with which you summarize books you have never read.

Ouch!

And Patton was indeed going home, and was actually hurt in the car accident the very day before he was leaving. Furthermore Patton was not retiring but resigning from the Army and he was planning to speak out re: corruption within SHAEF and expose what the Russians were really up to in Europe. He was resigning so that he could no longer be ordered to shut his mouth. So his death was either A) An extremely lucky accident for the Russians B)a plot to silence him.

But yeah, it's ludicrous to believe that Stalin would ever plot to have anyone killed, right?

Interesting. Of course, it turns out that Stalin had many spies in the British and US administrations. Think of the number of "atomic" spies who were eventually rounded up.

Lewisgunner15 May 2013 6:42 a.m. PST

How people love conspiracy theories. Stuff like that comes out in the wash at some point. Would the Russians really take the risk of the US finding out and starting a war when the US had the A bomb? No.
Would the US murder its own generals? No

Lewisgunner15 May 2013 7:02 a.m. PST

And did Patton know anything about what the Russians were doing that others did not know? Very doubtful.
The truth is that Roosevelt had been conned by Stalin who had exploited the division between the Western leaders. Roosevelt resented Churchill because Churchill wanted to use the US for British ends. However, Churchill, a man loaded with faults, was way better at foreign policy than Roosevelt who was frankly naive. Stalin went behind Churchill's back to Roosevelt and Roosevelt welcomed this. The world was to be carved up between the big two. The French were alt
Ready of no account, the British exhausted. Roosevelt loved it. He refused to go with Churchill on two key points
1) the war had been fought for Poland. At its end Poland should have its territory restored plus East Prussia.
2) all liberated countries should have been given guarantees of non interference. The British managed to get to help the Greeks in 47', but the US A would not stand up to Russia.
It is understandable that Truman wanted out of the war and the troops back hone, however, it took US administrations 3 years to understand that, despite having won the war the west was engaged with a worse enemy than the Nazis and had handed that enemy the advantage of holding all of Eastern Europe.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2013 8:23 a.m. PST

Roosevelt was not conned. He got what he wanted. Roosevelt was totally indifferent about the fate of Eastern Europe.
Heck, had he lived, the French would have never got back to retake Indochina.

If anyone was conned, it was Truman, and for that I blame Roosevelt who kept him totally in the dark.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2013 8:26 a.m. PST

OMG, those bozos make ME look "helpful"! grin

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2013 10:47 a.m. PST

Totally agree with you John!

Amicalement
Armand

1815Guy17 May 2013 3:32 a.m. PST

I think the Grassy Knoll did it.


Or possibly Monty…..

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.