Help support TMP


"No One Wants the Pentagon’s Gigantic Hydrogen-Powered Drone" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Mein Panzer


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:48 AMX 10-RC Tank Destroyer

Looking for an armored car with some punch?


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Copplestone's News Crew

Personal logo Dentatus Sponsoring Member of TMP Fezian thinks Mark's work is among the best available for all-around gaming and painting.


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Featured Book Review


1,118 hits since 30 Apr 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2013 12:18 p.m. PST

"The Pentagon spent millions developing a humongous hydrogen-fueled drone that, it hoped, could fly at soaring altitudes for a week at a time. Now the drone is all on its lonesome, because no one wants to buy it.

Built by drone manufacturer AeroVironment, the Global Observer is a 70-foot-long jumbo drone with a wingspan nearly as long as one of the Air Force's B-52 bombers. Powered by liquid-hydrogen fuel cells, it was billed as a persistent eye-in-the-sky capable of loitering at 65,000 feet for a week a time without spewing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The Pentagon also envisioned many missions. The drone's 380-pound payload of spy cameras and sensors could stare at a diameter of 600 miles of earth at once, while doubling as a communications relay. It could patrol the oceans and possibly track hurricanes — the Department of Homeland Security was interested in it too.

But now no one wants the giant drone. "Currently, no service or defense agency has advocated for it to be a program," Pentagon spokeswoman Maureen Schumann told InsideDefense (subscription only) in April. This was after spending $27.9 USD million developing the drone since 2007, which came to an end in December when the Pentagon closed down its development contract, the trade journal reports.

When emailed by Danger Room, the Pentagon didn't elaborate on the reasons why. "Global Observer was a technology demonstration, not a program," spokesperson Maureen Schumann wrote. But the Global Observer had run into danger before.


The first prototype, the GO-1, was destroyed in a crash during a test flight — its ninth test — at Edwards Air Force Base in April 2011. (The cause hasn't been revealed.) The Pentagon had also ordered a second prototype called the GO-2 before the first prototype's crash, but then renegotiated with the company to buy back the drone before it was completed. It also had a litany of now-former sponsors: the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard and U.S. Special Operations Command — and the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Strategic Command and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

So AeroVironment is stuck with it. "Our production facility has the ability to produce up to five air vehicles per year, our core team is intact and our strategic supply chain ready to move forward when we secure the commitment to do so," company spokesman Steven Gitlin told InsideDefense in a statement. If all else fails, another option would be for the company itself to fly the GO-2 and "sell the information or service it provides." But that's an open question.

Nor is the Global Observer the only giant hydrogen-powered spy drone on the market…"
Full article here
link

link

Amicalement
Armand

darthfozzywig30 Apr 2013 1:50 p.m. PST

I seem to recall another hydrogen-filled airship…

picture

Mako1130 Apr 2013 1:58 p.m. PST

I was going to ask, "what could possibly go wrong?", but I see someone has beaten me to that, with a visual answer.

Tgerritsen Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2013 2:09 p.m. PST

Why Hydrogen? Cost?

Coelacanth30 Apr 2013 2:54 p.m. PST

It's getting to be like Mad Libs; "Nobody wants the Pentagon's gigantic _______".

Ron

Gear Pilot30 Apr 2013 4:08 p.m. PST

Oh good grief. The Global Observer is an unmanned aircraft, not a dirigible – hince the "wingspan nearly as long as one of the Air Force's B-52 bombers". The hydrogen fuel is a "hydrogen fuel cell" to make electricity to run the propultion motor, not to fill gas bags.

Charlie 1230 Apr 2013 5:59 p.m. PST

"Our production facility has the ability to produce up to five air vehicles per year, our core team is intact and our strategic supply chain ready to move forward when we secure the commitment to do so,"

Y'all gonna be waiting for a looooong time….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.