Help support TMP


"Union Fleet Runs the Batteries at Vicksburg!" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

Music Video: Empress of Shadows

My first attempt at a historical music video, to promote interest in military history (and, indirectly, miniature wargaming!).


1,176 hits since 19 Apr 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP19 Apr 2013 9:17 p.m. PST

"The Mississippi corridor between Vicksburg and Port Hudson wasn't exactly a no-man's land, but every Federal ship that had ever ventured into its waters had failed to return. Both the Queen of the West and the Indianola, sent to cut off enemy supplies coming in from the Red River, had been attacked captured. More recently, Admiral David Farragut, commanding the West Gulf Blockading Squadron, had steamed north past Port Hudson and made it to Grant's troops opposite Vicksburg. He returned to the Red River, taking one of Admiral David Dixon Porter's ships with him for support.

So it was true that, so far, if a ship went south of Vicksburg, it would not (for whatever reason) return. In light of this, Porter was a little uneasy about Grant's proposed plan to move three transport vessels loaded with provisions past the Vicksburg batteries to John McClernand's troops, below at New Carthage.

Grant had requested to have two ironclad gunboats act as escort. Porter, on the other hand, thought it would take more, and attached eight, including his own flagship Benton. Helping him to make the decision was a message from Naval Secretary Gideon Welles, who wanted Porter south of Vicksburg so that Admiral Farragut could return to New Orleans and the rest of his squadron.

Porter had wanted to make the run on the 14th or 15th, but bad weather postponed it until this date. He desperately wanted to slip past the batteries without being noticed, but that was probably asking too much. The Confederates, however, unknowingly helped in this. The 16th was the date of a grand ball and, as darkness fell, many of the artillery officers left their commands for a night of beautiful women and dancing.

As the afternoon churned into evening, Admiral Porter ordered the boilers in his ships to get up steam. To the captains and pilots of the eight vessels, he instructed that they stick to the western, Louisiana bank so that the moon shadows of their ships would be camouflaged by the trees. But, if they were spotted by the Rebels, the entire fleet was to steer across the river and keep close to the Vicksburg side. This seemed almost counter-intuitive, but he believed that the Rebel guns atop the bluffs could not be depressed enough to hit them if they were directly below them.

The Confederate guns numbered thirty-seven, but, because of the ball, many were not commanded. Porter brought with him seventy-nine guns, all manned and ready to defend the fleet and the three supply transports. At 9:15pm, they began their descent from the mouth of the Yazoo…"
Full article here
link

picture

Question from an ignorant: If the Rebels command both banks of the river and they know that the enemy would tried to pass near Vicksburg, why they not put a long line of heavy chains on little boats to made a defensive cord that could stop the advance of the enemy ships or at least give a strong alarm to the defenders.?

How about barrels with powder as mines in that part if the enemy tried to pass throught.

At that stage of war (not the first days of it when you made much more mistakes) who in command of that important garrison allow that 3/4 of his men went to a ball?.

On those days, didn't exist the hand grenades as in Napoleonic Era?. I mean to be used against the transport ships from the banks or little boats.

Many thanks in advance for your guidance.

Amicalement
Armand

jdpintex20 Apr 2013 5:41 a.m. PST

The Mississippi is one of the largest rivers in the world, especially in regard to volume/flow rate. It is most difficult to put something across the river and hope it will stay. At the Battle of New Orleans they had to sink ships to try and block the river and they were less than successful. April is also the time of very high flow rates due to spring melt up north.

The river is much wider than the painting depicts. Mines would've been swept down the river.

Now you've got a point about letting everyone go to a ball, but then that's what surprise moves are all about…audacity one side and stupidity on the other.

Florida Tory20 Apr 2013 6:09 a.m. PST

We played that battle yesterday at Recon. Thanks to a superb effort by ACWBill to set it up and host the game, it looked spectacularly like the painting! His ironclads are all scratch-built in 10mm, to complement his great looking troop castings.

TMP link

Rick

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP20 Apr 2013 10:29 a.m. PST

Many thanks for your explaniations my friend jdpintex.
Now I understand.

Rick, that wargame looks AWESOME!.
Happy you had enjoy it!.

Amicalement
Armand

Agesilaus20 Apr 2013 8:44 p.m. PST

Also, from the Union perspective, David Glasgow Farragut and David Dixon Porter were quite formidable opponents. Not only were they the first two admirals in the U.S. Navy, but they were brothers, the son and adoptive son of Commodore David Porter of War of 1912 fame.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.