"Mainforce Review ? Comparison to GHQ/Adler" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Micro Armour: The Game Message Board Back to the 6mm WWII Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Modern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Current Poll
|
| PeteMahon | 08 Apr 2013 5:15 p.m. PST |
I was hoping to gain some information about Mainforce infantry compared to GHQ and Adler. Anyone have any insights on the matter…..Do they mix is anyone better than the other ?
Cheers |
 Editor in Chief Bill   | 08 Apr 2013 7:11 p.m. PST |
Hard to compare, since Main Force figures are generally prone, and other figures are generally standing. |
| ScoutJock | 09 Apr 2013 7:47 a.m. PST |
Take a look at this link: link Bob Makenzie reviews the different infantry available. |
 javelin98  | 09 Apr 2013 8:27 a.m. PST |
I have two of the MF packs (modern USMC and Afghans) and they're pretty decent. Not quite GHQ quality, but decent sculpts that paint up well. |
LeonAdler  | 09 Apr 2013 11:34 a.m. PST |
I do wish Bob Makenzie would take that pic off his website that is about the worst 6mm figure I've ever made! lol
Typical!lol
L |
| Bellbottom | 10 Apr 2013 5:24 a.m. PST |
Best this about Mainforce is their robustness, easy to paint too |
|
