Help support TMP


"Budget Cuts Are Set to Hit U.S. Military's Drone Fleet" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

Round Bases, Round Labels

Using self-adhesive labels to identify your minis.


Featured Movie Review


870 hits since 2 Apr 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2013 12:07 p.m. PST

Bad news.
"For all the ongoing hype about the U.S. military's arsenal of flying robots, they're anything but safe from budget cuts. Pentagon officials anticipate spending significantly less on their surveillance and attack drones over the next several years, effectively ending the drone boom of the previous decade.

The impending budget cuts are expected to affect each major funding source for the drones: the research and development accounts that keep new models coming online; the operations and maintenance accounts that keep current ones in the air; and the procurement accounts that keep the military purchasing them.

Already, the Pentagon is signaling that the boom times for drones are coming to an end, even as the robots remain one of the U.S.'s signature counterterrorism weapons. An overview prepared in February by Dyke Weatherington, who oversees unmanned systems for the Pentagon's acquisitions and technology directorate, outlined the downturn.

Across all the various military drone programs, R&D cash is expected to fall to $1.03 USD billion in fiscal 2017, nearly half of the $1.99 USD billion the Pentagon requested in the fiscal 2013 budget. Budget cuts caused the Pentagon to shrink its anticipated drone-research spending: Weatherington's presentation, delivered to the drone advocates at AUVSI and acquired by Danger Room, anticipates spending $1.3 USD billion in fiscal 2014, some $866 USD million less than the fiscal 2012 budget anticipated for that year.


Same goes for procurement, and what's known as "operations and maintenance." Weatherington anticipated that the Pentagon will spend $3 USD billion on drone purchases in 2014, some $814 USD less than the fiscal 2012 budget foresaw. And he expected that it'll want $983 USD million in fiscal 2014 to keep its current fleet flying and tuned up, down $309 USD million from the expectation in the fiscal 2012 budget. The downward pattern for all drone accounts continues through 2017.

It's possible that the fiscal 2014 budget, expected to be released on April 10, will revise those numbers further. "We're still looking at those numbers," says Maureen Schumann, a spokeswoman for Weatherington. Pentagon officials have described the current budget process as chaotic, as it's occurred against the backdrop of an ongoing White House-congressional feud over spending cuts.

But drone manufacturers and their advocates have been bracing themselves for the downturn for a while, even as the drones remain busy worldwide. Last year, the Air Force cut its drone purchases by half while actually upping the combat air patrols they fly. AUVSI has been pushing the utility of drones to farmers as the advocacy group sees the military market shrinking.

Every defense account is feeling pressure under mandatory budget cuts enacted by Congress. But some observers see the robots as being particularly vulnerable, as they don't have the traditional bureaucratic constituencies of other weapons systems.

"As the Pentagon wrestles with declining overall budget numbers, this would be the time to not let sunk costs drive us in the future. But the reality is that in tough budget times, the new becomes more directly threatening to the old," says Peter Singer, a defense analyst at the Brookings Institution. (Where, full disclosure, Danger Room boss Noah Shachtman has a non-resident fellowship.) "And in bureaucracies, the old is not only more established, but is often at an advantage. It is more likely to have existing internal constituencies and tribes, and stronger support from Congressional members protecting existing factories and jobs in their district versus the potential of future program offices and future pork barrel spending…"
Full article here.
link

Amicalement
Armand

15mm and 28mm Fanatik02 Apr 2013 12:25 p.m. PST

Bad news

Not really. The USAF currently has over 5,300 drones. That is more than three times the number of any other nation, not counting those of the USN and USMC.

And the more drones we procure, the higher the O&M budget necessary to operate and maintain them, unless we plan on retiring a good number of them.

It's a matter of too many drones.

Mako1102 Apr 2013 12:45 p.m. PST

Perhaps that'll mean the manufacturers will need to start making more economical ones to sell, and/or pricing competition will help with that as well.

I also hope it will also slow, or reduce the use of domestic drones over the USA. Given the current plans, the domestic USA surveillance systems planned make East Germany's Stasi look like Disneyland park attendants.

darthfozzywig02 Apr 2013 2:49 p.m. PST

Disneyland park attendants are always watching!

picture

Mako1102 Apr 2013 6:01 p.m. PST

Wow, better watch what I whisper too, since no doubt those large ears will pick up that as well.

Personal logo Condotta Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2013 6:38 p.m. PST

I heard that!

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2013 10:27 p.m. PST

I understand my friend. I wrote "bad news" because imho is better to lost drones and not humans in any war mission.

Amicalement
Armand

Number602 Apr 2013 11:16 p.m. PST

>Not really. The USAF currently has over 5,300 drones. That is more than three times the number of any other nation, not counting those of the USN and USMC.

>And the more drones we procure, the higher the O&M budget necessary to operate and maintain them, unless we plan on retiring a good number of them.

>It's a matter of too many drones.

That couldn't be more BS. The development and combat life cycle of a drone is 1/10 that of a manned system – and drones are still in their infancy. 5300 drones don't do you any good if they are all obsolete.

Deadone03 Apr 2013 4:14 p.m. PST

I assume a lot of those drones are smaller battlefield surveillance systems that are suitable to COIN ala Afghanistan or Iraq and not necessarily useful in higher level conventional war (much like MRAPs)?

Interestingly enough the US cancelled an RQ-4 variant in favour of continued operations of U-2s.

Apparently the U-2 was still better at the stratetgic intel job than the drone.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.