Help support TMP


"Remember the Alamo! Take II" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Pz8 - 1935/65 Aerial Wargame Rules


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 11

We track down the identity of another mystery Vietnam figure.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting More of the Corporate Babes

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian says he's pretty happy with these babes...


1,072 hits since 31 Mar 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
SouthernPhantom31 Mar 2013 10:08 a.m. PST

(I figured this was more appropriate for the Battle Reports section) A buddy of mine and I decided to reenact the Battle of the Alamo with my new Paradox ruleset. The only difference from historical events is that a US Army mechanized column from 2023 is moving in from Fort Hood to assist the Texans…

link

StarfuryXL531 Mar 2013 10:40 a.m. PST

But, where were the chupacabras?

ancientsgamer31 Mar 2013 5:41 p.m. PST

Only 10 victory point for the Texians holding on the the Alamo? You jest, right?

SouthernPhantom31 Mar 2013 6:02 p.m. PST

My thoughts were that they should have been able to do a whole lot more with the addition of the Bradley platoon. We were debating whether the reinforcements should come in after Turn 4 or Turn 3. If it had been Turn 3, we would have seen a fairly decisive Texian victory, as the Mexicans would have been badly mauled and unable to inflict the killing blow.

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER31 Mar 2013 6:17 p.m. PST

The repeating rifles alone should skew the outcome!

SouthernPhantom31 Mar 2013 7:04 p.m. PST

Basically no repeating rifles were in common service until things like the Colt revolver rifles and Spencers showed up around the late 1840s-1860s. If you're referring to the M4 carbines, yes, they did inflict serious casualties once the Guardsmen dismounted and engaged. By my math, a single M4A3 (I aggregated standard-issue weapons into one statistic per stand) is the equivalent of 2.5 muskets. What you don't see is that each Texian/Mexican unit of two figures represents ten men, while each US fireteam represents only four.
When I begin factoring in grenade launchers and SAWs, the overall combat effectiveness is 2.4:1 in favor of the US. Overall, a 2023 US Army/National Guard infantryman is 600% as effective as a early-mid 19th century soldier. If I take into account the rough points system I have in effect, the modern advantage is something like 353%, but fails to take into the theoretical 2.125:1 advantage the older troops have in survivability in a theoretically balanced engagement, as well as the short range of some modern support weapons.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP03 Apr 2013 8:03 a.m. PST

Reminds me of an old Twilight Zone episode with an M5 Stuart some how ending up at the Little Big Horn !

SouthernPhantom03 Apr 2013 4:44 p.m. PST

That…does not sound like a bad idea at all :D

I'm also planning a campaign to 'defuse' the War of Northern Aggression. Special Forces operating covertly in the middle of Second Corinth should be good fun…

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.