Help support TMP


"Heavy and Light cavalry (uniforms)" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Painting Guides Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


1,003 hits since 22 Mar 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Sir Sasquatch22 Mar 2013 7:26 a.m. PST

Hi All,

I don't really don't understand why only the light cavalry wore the spectacular outfits. Why not , for example, the dragoons. When you look at the pictures link
the dragoons and lancers looked quite poor comparing to the hussars. What was the reasoning behind this ?

summerfield22 Mar 2013 9:48 a.m. PST

Tradition. The Hussar uniform was based upon the Hungarian national dress back in the early C18th.
Stephen

Esquire22 Mar 2013 10:02 a.m. PST

Agree. As you say, that is even the case in the SYW. Dragoons and heavy horse, plain colors with nice facings, but not as much lace etc as hussars. Remember the quote attributed to LaSalle, "Any hussar who is not dead by the age of 30 is a Bleeped text (or blackguard depending upon your choice of translation)" They supposed rode by different standards.

Personal logo Mserafin Supporting Member of TMP22 Mar 2013 10:18 a.m. PST

I would suggest it was a matter of cost. Hussars are pretty, but the uniforms are expensive. Fine for a few regiments, but you wouldn't want to pay for that kind of rig for 30 regiments of dragoons.

In fact, the entire history of uniform development after the Nap wars is one of continual simplification, as armies got bigger faster than the budgets of the countries they served. So, simpler, cheaper uniforms.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP22 Mar 2013 12:31 p.m. PST

While French hussars are very colourful, the Chasseus a Cheval – who were much more numerous – had a fairly plain uniform (by Napoleonic standards)

Bandit22 Mar 2013 12:32 p.m. PST

Cost is a funny thing. The heavies cost a lot too. French Carabiniers à Cheval & Cuirassiers were not cheap to maintain. I don't think the question is correctly framed as "light vs heavy".

My perspective is we should be considering this as "elite vs rank". The rank and file of the French light and medium cavalry were the Chasseurs à Cheval & Dragoons. Their uniforms were bland. The elite of the cavalry were the Hussards, Cuirassiers & Carabiniers à Cheval. Their uniforms were more dressed up.

Cheers,

The Bandit

Supercilius Maximus22 Mar 2013 2:31 p.m. PST

In some respects, it was also down to the attitude of the Colonel of the regiment, the size of regimental funds, and long-standing traditions (resulting from either longevity, previous amalgamations, or conversion from one type of unit to another). For example, the low-numbered Chasseur a Cheval regiments adopted certain facets of hussar dress to highlight their longer pedigrees.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.