
"Heavy and Light cavalry (uniforms)" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Painting Guides Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.
Featured Profile Article
|
| Sir Sasquatch | 22 Mar 2013 7:26 a.m. PST |
Hi All, I don't really don't understand why only the light cavalry wore the spectacular outfits. Why not , for example, the dragoons. When you look at the pictures link the dragoons and lancers looked quite poor comparing to the hussars. What was the reasoning behind this ? |
| summerfield | 22 Mar 2013 9:48 a.m. PST |
Tradition. The Hussar uniform was based upon the Hungarian national dress back in the early C18th. Stephen |
| Esquire | 22 Mar 2013 10:02 a.m. PST |
Agree. As you say, that is even the case in the SYW. Dragoons and heavy horse, plain colors with nice facings, but not as much lace etc as hussars. Remember the quote attributed to LaSalle, "Any hussar who is not dead by the age of 30 is a (or blackguard depending upon your choice of translation)" They supposed rode by different standards. |
Mserafin  | 22 Mar 2013 10:18 a.m. PST |
I would suggest it was a matter of cost. Hussars are pretty, but the uniforms are expensive. Fine for a few regiments, but you wouldn't want to pay for that kind of rig for 30 regiments of dragoons. In fact, the entire history of uniform development after the Nap wars is one of continual simplification, as armies got bigger faster than the budgets of the countries they served. So, simpler, cheaper uniforms. |
Frederick  | 22 Mar 2013 12:31 p.m. PST |
While French hussars are very colourful, the Chasseus a Cheval – who were much more numerous – had a fairly plain uniform (by Napoleonic standards) |
| Bandit | 22 Mar 2013 12:32 p.m. PST |
Cost is a funny thing. The heavies cost a lot too. French Carabiniers à Cheval & Cuirassiers were not cheap to maintain. I don't think the question is correctly framed as "light vs heavy". My perspective is we should be considering this as "elite vs rank". The rank and file of the French light and medium cavalry were the Chasseurs à Cheval & Dragoons. Their uniforms were bland. The elite of the cavalry were the Hussards, Cuirassiers & Carabiniers à Cheval. Their uniforms were more dressed up. Cheers, The Bandit |
| Supercilius Maximus | 22 Mar 2013 2:31 p.m. PST |
In some respects, it was also down to the attitude of the Colonel of the regiment, the size of regimental funds, and long-standing traditions (resulting from either longevity, previous amalgamations, or conversion from one type of unit to another). For example, the low-numbered Chasseur a Cheval regiments adopted certain facets of hussar dress to highlight their longer pedigrees. |
|