Help support TMP


"Chinese Drone Swarms" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board

Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Team Yankee


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 2

Can you identify the specialist?


Featured Workbench Article

A Couple That is Possessed Together, Stays Together

DemosLaserCutDesigns Fezian says these Possessed Zombies would lend themselves well to a zombie game based on the world of the Evil Dead movies.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Personal logo Editor Julia Supporting Member of TMP would like your support for a special project.


Featured Book Review


1,518 hits since 13 Mar 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Mako1113 Mar 2013 3:47 p.m. PST

An interesting article on the future use of drones by the Chinese, and some of their possible tactics:

link

Tgerritsen Supporting Member of TMP13 Mar 2013 4:48 p.m. PST

Someone has been playing Star Fleet Battles. :)

Whatisitgood4atwork13 Mar 2013 8:35 p.m. PST

Thanks. Yes, very interesting. I have been wondering about the tactical possibilities / feasibility of drones used in swarms rather than in ones and twos for a while now.

I know the manned jet fighter and the surface ship have been declared obsolete many times before, and always wrongly, but this could be the beginning of the end for them. A drone can't match a manned jet fighter, but what about 50 drones?

Strategically this could be a game changer. I do not think China can ever catch up with the USA in carrier technology or numbers – in the foreseeable future anyway. But if there is a leapfrog in technology and they don't have to, it could be a whole new ball game.

ghostdog14 Mar 2013 8:09 a.m. PST

no matter how many drones are in a swarm… if you can hack/block the data link of one of them, you can do the same thing to all. if you have the technological advantage to do it, numbers dont matter.
and against modern manned figthers, current drone.s are just flying targets. if you start to put tech into the drones like their own radars, elecyronic countermeasures, radar warning systems…their price will skyrocket.

Fred Cartwright14 Mar 2013 12:08 p.m. PST

no matter how many drones are in a swarm… if you can hack/block the data link of one of them, you can do the same thing to all. if you have the technological advantage to do it, numbers dont matter.

Not sure the US has the edge when it comes to hacking. Chinese hackers are causing allsorts of problems worldwide. The US could find the boot on the other foot with its own drones being hacked.

Garand14 Mar 2013 12:45 p.m. PST

Not sure the US has the edge when it comes to hacking. Chinese hackers are causing allsorts of problems worldwide. The US could find the boot on the other foot with its own drones being hacked.

And yet another reason why not to rely overmuch on drones. They're great when fighting an insurgency, or hunting terrorist. But as soon as you fight an enemy on an equal footing…

Damon.

Delta Vee14 Mar 2013 1:06 p.m. PST

as far as i understand, why hack when you can jam? if they cant be controlled wont they fall back on inbuilt programming?

Fred Cartwright14 Mar 2013 1:28 p.m. PST

as far as i understand, why hack when you can jam? if they cant be controlled wont they fall back on inbuilt programming?

Looking at the article the plan is for quite a lot of built in capability – so I'm guessing active control is only for the final attack phase. Jamming 50+ frequency agile drones could prove tricky.

flicking wargamer15 Mar 2013 8:27 a.m. PST

Isn't that just a guided missile at that point? Most of the anti-ship missiles now look like moderate sized aircraft (if not bigger). Why build a drone to do the same thing? So you can watch it on TV? They can do that already.

Fred Cartwright15 Mar 2013 8:47 a.m. PST

Why build a drone to do the same thing?

You can save quite a lot by getting rid of the pilot. No ejector seat for a start, plus all the equipement to convert electronic signals into things that can be understood by him/her – ie all the displays and the gear to give control feedback. Then there is the all the kit to convert pilot input into electronic signals – joystick, pedals, throttle, trigger, arming swithches etc. Then once you have the software written and tested you are sorted. No need to train new pilots – saving all those training aircraft, instructors, fuel etc. No need to keep pilots upto speed – so save on training flights/exercises, practice weapons, fuel, maintainance etc. Your drone pilots can train electronically – as that's what they are doing for real anyway.

ghostdog15 Mar 2013 9:27 a.m. PST

i think flicking wargamer means that everything that a drone can do can be done by an antiship misil

Fred Cartwright15 Mar 2013 9:47 a.m. PST

i think flicking wargamer means that everything that a drone can do can be done by an antiship misil

Except visual target aquisition and confirmation! I guess a drone is a half way house between a smart missile and a fully piloted plane. It is just another option. It has advatages and disadvantages against both.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.