Help support TMP


"CD vs TAC" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Rules Message Board

Back to the Command Decision Message Board


Action Log

08 Mar 2013 1:05 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Crossposted to WWII Rules board

Areas of Interest

World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Action Stations !


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

White Night #1: Unknown Aircraft

First of a series – scenario starters!


Featured Movie Review


1,393 hits since 8 Mar 2013
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Guthroth08 Mar 2013 12:56 p.m. PST

Hi

can anyone tell me how CD compares with TAC ?

TIA

Pete

Steve W09 Mar 2013 4:53 a.m. PST

Hi Gunroth

Do you mean TAC the 6mm rules from ages ago?

Nice set maybe too many phases in the game when it comes to shooting compared to CD and definitely plays slower

Cd or Test of battle as its called now plays a lot quicker always loved the big move distances if you can get away with it scale is similar in both games.

Both games though do give you a good feeling of combined arms

Guthroth09 Mar 2013 5:43 a.m. PST

Yes, that's them. Written for 6mm, but we still play it with 15 and 20mm figures.

So CD plays quicker ?

Steve W09 Mar 2013 7:32 a.m. PST

Its years since I played TAC but I remember it being slow…they did do some lovely scenario books for it

But yes CD is quicker though I have played a lot more of it so maybe that is why, but it does have about half the phases that TAC does

Can you still buy TAC?

Martin Rapier09 Mar 2013 1:24 p.m. PST

Umm, having played both, I'd find it hard to argue that CD plays any quicker. Perhaps CD IV, but certainly not CD II.

In CD you don't make tac rolls to change orders/mode, you just slap those command chits down. AFV combat is rather more complex in CD. They are pitched at slightly different game levels, CD works fine with a reinforced Bn per player whereas we played TAC with regiments/brigades.

Speed of play is partly a question familiarity, but yes, TAC does have an awful lot of firing phases which could have been simply compressed by just saying 'stationary units shoot first' a la Spearhead.

I think the morale and element quality system in CD is vastly superior to that in TAC.

Rich Bliss09 Mar 2013 2:47 p.m. PST

The newest version of CD plays much faster than CDII, which was the slowest playing of any of the 4 editions.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.