"Erratum for Battlesystem 2 ?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Battlesystem Message Board
Areas of InterestFantasy
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
|
| Helowyn | 26 Feb 2013 4:15 a.m. PST |
Dear board members,
I'm wondering if there is any official erratum for the 2nd version of Battlesystem (tsr 9266) ? I'm currently translating it into french, and I'd like to take into account any correction which may have been published by TSR. Kind regards, |
| whill4 | 26 Feb 2013 8:06 a.m. PST |
To the best of my knowledge there is not an official erratum. |
| Rubber Suit Theatre | 26 Feb 2013 10:43 a.m. PST |
TMP link American companies tend to use "errata" instead of erratum – probably confused your google search. |
| Helowyn | 28 Feb 2013 8:49 a.m. PST |
Thanks a lot for the link :-) The additionnal moral check rule seems an important fix, because it was not clear at all for me in the rules how many times you had to check the moral of a unit, since many moral triggers were described as mandatory but p16 it was also mentioned that "a unit is not required to make more than one morale check during any step of a turn" How did you understand it (and practiced it) without this errata? |
| Rubber Suit Theatre | 28 Feb 2013 2:48 p.m. PST |
To be honest, I've never played. While I respect Gygax as an innovator, I always hated his rule systems (while understanding that others do not). I just hunt down information sometimes. |
|
reveals axemen for his Volcano Dwarf army.