Help support TMP


"The USS Freedom new camouflage" Topic


25 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 9

We've got helicopter door gunners, but no helicopter!


Featured Workbench Article

Steel Bases for AK47 Vehicles

If you want to magnetically store your 15mm vehicles, then you'd better add some steel!


Featured Profile Article

Ammunition Hill 1967

Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.


Featured Book Review


2,616 hits since 21 Feb 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP21 Feb 2013 8:38 p.m. PST

If you are going to paint the miniature of this ship…

"Completing a technical stop before its first major deployment in the Asia / Pacific region, the first Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Freedom, has changed its look. The ship, located in San Diego, on the west coast of the United States, now boasts a livery camouflage, as we had not seen in the U.S. Navy for many years.

Designed for littoral operations, the LCS Freedom class, two units are currently in operation, measuring 115.5 meters long and have a displacement of 3090 tons burden. Capable of reaching 45 knots with two gas turbines and waterjets MT30 Kamewa Rolls-Royce, they can board a helicopter and have a basic armament centered around a surface-to-air system RAM, a tower of 57 mm and four 12.7 mm machine guns. With boarding interchangeable modules, they can be configured for anti-surface warfare, mine hunting, or anti-submarine warfare. In this area, they could also carry a towed sonar CAPTAS 4 of Thales."
Oht

before

picture

now

picture

From
link

Amicalement
Armand

jpattern221 Feb 2013 9:16 p.m. PST

Dazzle, I like it.

Charlie 1221 Feb 2013 9:58 p.m. PST

Don't care how much make-up you put on it, a pig is still a pig. And this poor excuse for a ship is the ultimate pig…

Mako1122 Feb 2013 1:07 a.m. PST

That's a very large vessel, with less punch than an old, German Type 143A Gepard missile boat.

It carried 1 x 76mm gun, 4 x Exocets, and the RAM system.

Sure, it doesn't have the endurance of this, and couldn't land a helo, but unless the latter is very heavily armed, its still a better vessel for coastal actions in my book, for a lot less cost.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Feb 2013 2:52 a.m. PST

Am I just being overly cynical, or does anyone else think the new scheme hasn't been introduced for its camouflage value at all, but rather was invented because someone important was offended by all the unsightly soot from her exhaust vents…?

David Manley22 Feb 2013 2:56 a.m. PST

Zing! Give that (cynical) man a coconut! :)

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Feb 2013 3:06 a.m. PST

:-)

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian22 Feb 2013 5:46 a.m. PST

"Am I just being overly cynical, or does anyone else think the new scheme hasn't been introduced for its camouflage value at all, but rather was invented because someone important was offended by all the unsightly soot from her exhaust vents…?"

That was the absolute first thing I thought.

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian22 Feb 2013 6:03 a.m. PST

What ship is that in the background?

Coelacanth22 Feb 2013 6:26 a.m. PST

"Am I just being overly cynical, or does anyone else think the new scheme hasn't been introduced for its camouflage value at all, but rather was invented because someone important was offended by all the unsightly soot from her exhaust vents…?"

Remember, smoking ziggurats are hazardous to your health.

Ron

P.S. Why couldn't they just build more gunboats?

link

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Feb 2013 6:37 a.m. PST


What ship is that in the background?

Dunno which one, but a Bob Hope class preposition ship – probably USNS Bob Hope from a Google – most of the others are Atlantic Fleet.

Personal logo Virtualscratchbuilder Supporting Member of TMP Fezian22 Feb 2013 7:02 a.m. PST

Thanks… I figured it would be something like that given the cranes and heavy lift.

jdpintex22 Feb 2013 7:08 a.m. PST

Why would you have exhaust vents so close to the water line. I'm pretty sure naval history has pointed out the dangers to having holes in the hull close to the waterline.

Hopefully someone will remember to close a hatch during rough seas!

Personal logo McKinstry Supporting Member of TMP Fezian22 Feb 2013 8:15 a.m. PST

Those goofy exhaust vents are about the only reason I can think of for reintroducing Measure 32.

LCS = Little Crappy Ship

Cloudy22 Feb 2013 8:16 a.m. PST

In the original link, there are some photos showing the progress on the Zumwalt which I had almost forgotten about if anyone is interested. Also, a web search for photos will bring up various items.

DowvoovooDaHunter22 Feb 2013 9:12 a.m. PST

given that the US govt is cutting back the cash flow to the navy, I think it is very forward thinking on the navy part. hell urban battles are all the rage, right?

PHGamer22 Feb 2013 9:50 a.m. PST

by all the unsightly soot from her exhaust vents…?"

My first thought also. That is the same reason that US ships were painted Haz Grey except for the masts and stacks, which were painted black.

Phil Hall22 Feb 2013 10:07 a.m. PST

I think they did it to help camoed sailors hide better.

Lion in the Stars22 Feb 2013 1:04 p.m. PST

No, sailors wear camo to hide paint-marks, because there is ALWAYS fresh paint where you're walking.

Ron W DuBray22 Feb 2013 1:45 p.m. PST

the ship in the background :)

fast sea lift ship

picture

mostly used for moving ground forces
USNS Watkins (T-AKR-315) is one of Military Sealift Command's nineteen Large, Medium-Speed Roll-on/Roll-off Ships and is part of the 33 ships in the Prepositioning Program. She is a Watson-class vehicle cargo ship.

She was named for Master Sergeant Travis E. Watkins, a Medal of Honor recipient.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP22 Feb 2013 4:03 p.m. PST

Close but not quite – she's definitely a Bob Hope class, not a Watson – look at the arrangement of the hull cutouts aft of the side loading ramp; 3 in a row, break, 6 in a row, then a mini one. (On a Watson it's 2, break, 5 – doesn't match the photo.) Also there are no entry ports at the same level as the ramp, which there are on the Watsons. There's a good side-on of the Bob Hope here:

picture

Lion in the Stars22 Feb 2013 8:35 p.m. PST

Why would you have exhaust vents so close to the water line. I'm pretty sure naval history has pointed out the dangers to having holes in the hull close to the waterline.
Diesels are positive-displacement pumps, they can handle a little water pressure on the exhaust system. Subs do it all the time, the big snorkel mast is only an air intake.

Deadone24 Feb 2013 6:32 p.m. PST

Wow the Zumwalt looks truly monstrous.

Needs more turrets though – way more turrets.

Lion in the Stars24 Feb 2013 7:44 p.m. PST

picture

Who needs more turrets when one gun can put down an entire turret's worth between the autoloaders and barrel cooling?

Mako1125 Feb 2013 12:23 a.m. PST

Well, when that ONE gun breaks, or its loader fails, I'll bet the captain and crew will wish the designer had included more than one on the vessel.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.