Help support TMP


"Navy: No New Weapons System on..." Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Beer and Pretzels Skirmish (BAPS)


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

C-in-C's 1:285 Soviet SAU122

Need some armored artillery vehicles?


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


1,052 hits since 13 Feb 2013
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP13 Feb 2013 12:21 p.m. PST

…Our Future Carrier-Based Drone.

"The admiral in charge of the Navy's drone development says there will be "no new weapons development program" for the drone the Navy wants to operate on an aircraft carrier.

Rear Adm. Matthias Winter told a drone-industry conference on Wednesday that the Navy isn't going to design any new weapons for its future Unmanned Carrier Launched Airborne Surveillance and Strike System, or UCLASS. The futuristic drone, which the Navy wants to take off and land from an aircraft carrier at the click of a mouse, will use weapons already in the magazines of aircraft carriers.

In other words, even though the UCLASS will likely be the most advanced drone in the U.S. fleet, its weapons — most likely missiles — are going to be familiar.

Very little has been public about the weapons that the UCLASS will carry. Winter, a senior official with the Navy's aviation branch, indicated that's because little has been decided about them. The demonstration model built for UCLASS, the batwing-shaped X-47B, will "never carry a weapon," Winter said in response to a Danger Room question about UCLASS' weapons systems.

The Navy intends to issue a solicitation to defense companies as early as this year for industry to compete for what UCLASS should actually look like. Winter said the Navy plans on a "dialog" with defense companies about the weapons systems aboard the carrier drone, and how it integrates into the other systems on the drone, rather than a set Navy dictate. "There will be strike capability as part of this solicitation," Winter said, without elaboration. "The specifics will be in the trade space…"
Full article here
link

Had to wait to 2020.

Amicalement
Armand

KHussey13 Feb 2013 12:50 p.m. PST

Interesting link thank you. Don't you mean wait until 2019?

Ron W DuBray13 Feb 2013 6:23 p.m. PST

sure just have it use the weapons that the Navy has some of them are the best in the world and don't need replacing.

Lion in the Stars14 Feb 2013 2:24 p.m. PST

Yeah, why design a weapon just for the drone, when it can currently carry anything in the inventory smaller than a 2000lb Paveway bomb?

Deadone17 Feb 2013 4:35 p.m. PST

I don't understand why this is an issue either.

Given limited space on a carrier, I'd want the munitions for a UCAV to be the same for an F/A-18 or F-35.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.