
"MJ Figures 15mm Panhard AML 90 review" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
| Risaldar Singh | 10 Feb 2013 2:26 p.m. PST |
I have a short review of MJ Figures' 15mm Panhard AML 90 along with side-by-side pics with the Peter Pig version.
More photos on my blog: link |
| GeoffQRF | 11 Feb 2013 3:19 p.m. PST |
This model appears to have been built by using a Panhard sales brochure as reference material as the combination of upgraded turret and engine doesn't really match any in-service version A common problem is that many plans are drawn up off sales materials or prototype designs, and vary from what makes it into final production. Sometimes it is small details, but sometimes the changes can be quite significant. You have to be careful even with photos, as many are taken of sales prototypes, rather than full production vehicles. |
| Risaldar Singh | 12 Feb 2013 7:36 a.m. PST |
Yes, it's interesting to see how easy it is to find plans of modern vehicles and how hard it is to find accurate plans of modern vehicles
Couple that with the facts that some vehicles come in a myriad of variants tailored to each customer and it can quickly become a nightmare to sort out what's what. Nowadays, I'm happy if the general shape is correct. Comparing the two models was interesting because it shows that: 1. A minor difference in size for one main component (the turret) gives the impression that the model is much smaller overall. 2. When a particular model has been on the market for a long time, such as the PP AML, it sets the standard of what looks "too small" or "too large". |
| GeoffQRF | 13 Feb 2013 2:45 a.m. PST |
When a particular model has been on the market for a long time, such as the PP AML, it sets the standard of what looks "too small" or "too large" That's actually quite a significant factor. We occasionally see posted here that X or Y are small, whereas it could well be simply that Z is over size and X or Y are correct! There is also a general perception that all tanks are 'big and chunky' therefore the biggest one must be right. |
|