Mercurius | 04 Feb 2013 4:15 a.m. PST |
Apologies if this duplicates another message. Archaeologists confirm the Leicester bones are indeed those of England's last Plantagenet king
link Mercurius The Pike and Shot Society |
daghan | 04 Feb 2013 4:19 a.m. PST |
What a spoiler! I was looking forward to the TV programme tonight. |
Mercurius | 04 Feb 2013 4:24 a.m. PST |
No spoiling was intended :( I had assumed it was appropriate news content to share. M |
McWong73 | 04 Feb 2013 4:30 a.m. PST |
That is pretty cool news. |
Texas Jack | 04 Feb 2013 4:45 a.m. PST |
Thatīs great news, especially coming on the heels of the buried Spitfires disappointment. |
Footslogger | 04 Feb 2013 5:20 a.m. PST |
Excellent news. Looking forward very much to seeing more of the evidence in detail. Arrangements for his re-interrment yet to be confirmed – but I'd like to be there. I hope there will be enough samples kept above ground should retesting ever be necessary, and that full 3D scans of the skeleton will have been made. |
Bellbottom | 04 Feb 2013 6:05 a.m. PST |
|
Balin Shortstuff | 04 Feb 2013 6:24 a.m. PST |
He does have the curvature of the spine, putting one shoulder higher than the other. They're going to take a digital copy of the skull and recreate the face. |
daghan | 04 Feb 2013 6:26 a.m. PST |
Only joking, Mercurius. Now, if someone would test the DNA of the Glastonbury skeltons
|
Mercurius | 04 Feb 2013 6:29 a.m. PST |
No problem. TMP can be a tough audience at times |
chrisminiaturefigs | 04 Feb 2013 7:32 a.m. PST |
Great news.Also shows you carnt trust anything writen in the tudor period ,didnt they say Richards remains had been tipped into the nearest river. Those lying horrible tudors |
Yesthatphil | 04 Feb 2013 7:39 a.m. PST |
This, and the Battlefields Trust work at Bosworth, giVes us a much better picture of what happened, and where, in 1485
Phil |
boy wundyr x | 04 Feb 2013 8:05 a.m. PST |
The one identified living relation is in Canada, so I expect we'll be mounting an invasion to reclaim the throne soon. |
CooperSteveOnTheLaptop | 04 Feb 2013 8:08 a.m. PST |
No shroud, no coffin, hands possibly tied. dumped in a too small grave. Knifed to the butt-ocks, probably while dead over the horse. Welcome to Leicester, your majesty! |
McKinstry | 04 Feb 2013 8:23 a.m. PST |
Good on all involved. England's last king to die in battle deserved better than a parking lot and Tudor slander. |
darthfozzywig | 04 Feb 2013 8:33 a.m. PST |
The one identified living relation is in Canada, so I expect we'll be mounting an invasion to reclaim the throne soon.
While you're away, we'll mount an invasion of Canadia* to get some payback for that "burn the White House" thing. 'Muricans reserve that right for themselves! * yes, Canadia.
|
Steve W | 04 Feb 2013 8:41 a.m. PST |
Well if I was one of the relatives I would be keeping my head down
If NCP owned that car park the costs are going to be huge for staying after it was locked for the evening |
boy wundyr x | 04 Feb 2013 8:41 a.m. PST |
That was the House of Hanover that did that, not the innocent Plantagenets. |
Parzival | 04 Feb 2013 8:47 a.m. PST |
"Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this son of York!" Raise the standards, boys, and bring back the House of York! |
dwight shrute | 04 Feb 2013 8:52 a.m. PST |
Theres also Plantagenets ( Mike Abney ) living in Australia . I wonder if the authorities will now allow DNA tests on the 2 skeletons believed to be the '' two princes in the tower'' . Apparently Richard will be interred at Leicester Cathedral . link |
daghan | 04 Feb 2013 9:33 a.m. PST |
"
bring back the House of York!" Given the present Duke of York, you might want to think twice about that one. |
DontTreadOnMe | 04 Feb 2013 9:34 a.m. PST |
Boooo
.hissss. The Stanleys rule! |
parrskool | 04 Feb 2013 9:37 a.m. PST |
Many thanks to the researchers who Spotted Dick ! |
Steve W | 04 Feb 2013 9:39 a.m. PST |
A Hearse A Hearse
. My Kingdom for a Hearse |
religon | 04 Feb 2013 9:46 a.m. PST |
It appears that his feet were missing from the skeletal remains. Is this a mystery of history? |
manchesterreg | 04 Feb 2013 10:10 a.m. PST |
The fact his hands were tied together means maybe, he didnt die in Battle but after. |
Jeremy Sutcliffe | 04 Feb 2013 10:24 a.m. PST |
I had a hunch it might be |
Parzival | 04 Feb 2013 11:29 a.m. PST |
"
bring back the House of York!"Given the present Duke of York, you might want to think twice about that one. I did say "House of York," which is a family lineage. "Duke of York" is a title. I believe the current title holder is of the House of Windsor (Saxe-Gothburg, actually), so clearly I am not referring to him. |
Captain dEwell | 04 Feb 2013 11:30 a.m. PST |
I have previously struggled to understand the relationship between Richard III and the 'Princes in the Tower'. In a modern day setting I see it as; Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is long dead. Her son and heir, King Charles III, has recently died and his two heirs, William and Harry, are incarcerated in the Tower of London by Charles's brother, Prince Andrew, after Charles' marriage to Diana (remember her) is declared illigitimate. William and Harry 'disappear', so Andrew, Duke of York, takes the Crown and becomes King Andrew I, of England. Simples really. And that gives you the basis of a game of Very British Civil War MkII. |
WillieB | 04 Feb 2013 11:31 a.m. PST |
Very exciting find. Just heard the news on Belgian television. Did I hear correctly that they found an arrowhead in his spine? |
Great War Ace | 04 Feb 2013 11:53 a.m. PST |
Two heavy blows to the head, other damage, not yet determined if prior to or after death. Hadn't heard of an arrowhead, until you mentioned it. I suspect he was taken alive, if also mostly dead, and finished off. That would explain tied hands. Missing feet? Weird one, that
. |
MajorB | 04 Feb 2013 11:59 a.m. PST |
Did I hear correctly that they found an arrowhead in his spine? Apparently not: link |
Daniel S | 04 Feb 2013 12:20 p.m. PST |
The hands could be tied for the simple reason that it was easier to transport the body that way. Even the most hostile Tudor accounts portray Richard as being killed while fighting bravely on the field battle so I don't see much reason to doubt that that was the case. The feet were probably lost when the fundations of a later building cut through that part of the grave, at least that is the explaination given by the archeologists. |
RedSaber | 04 Feb 2013 12:42 p.m. PST |
Missing feet = saves on the extra digging. Or maybe the gravedigger just needed some new shoes
. If he couldn't find a horse what need he of feet?? |
Steve W | 04 Feb 2013 1:36 p.m. PST |
|
religon | 04 Feb 2013 1:37 p.m. PST |
I found a quote confirming Daniels information that "scientists say [his skeleton was] disturbed sometime after burial" resulting in the missing feet. Another source speculates that it was the digging of a church's foundation before the present Franciscan friary that caused the lost feet. I suspect there is physical evidence of the earth being disturbed. It appears unlikely to have anything to do with mutilation or as a labor savings measure. Footslogger may wish to make travel plans as, "[N]ext year Richard will, at last, get a king's burial, interred with pomp and ceremony in Leicester Cathedral." |
bridget midget the return | 04 Feb 2013 2:59 p.m. PST |
The documentary is shockingly bad. |
boy wundyr x | 04 Feb 2013 3:28 p.m. PST |
Tied hands and missing feet
zombie precautions? |
Steve W | 04 Feb 2013 3:41 p.m. PST |
The documentary was a bit average |
ttauri | 04 Feb 2013 3:57 p.m. PST |
The Richard III Society come across very poorly. |
Last Hussar | 04 Feb 2013 5:00 p.m. PST |
On a parallel line, I had a direct descendent of Lord 'Join the side that's winning' Stanley as my Chief Engineer in Star Treck RPG in the late 80's |
LostPict | 04 Feb 2013 8:11 p.m. PST |
So it mentions that he could have stood at 5'8" (but probably due to spinal curvature). Was this short, tall, or medium for the time? Lost Pict |
Great War Ace | 04 Feb 2013 8:18 p.m. PST |
Spot on average. So he would have been taller yet if he had a straight back
. |
Footslogger | 05 Feb 2013 2:54 a.m. PST |
His brother, Edward IV, was said to be VERY tall, and most impressive in his armour. As to the location of his final resting place, yes, the official position is that it will be Leicester Cathedral, but did I hear that it won't be until 2014? That gives plenty time for lobbying groups to press for a rethink. No comment from the Palace yet. I wonder what Her Maj makes of it all. |
Oh Bugger | 05 Feb 2013 3:54 a.m. PST |
"The Richard III Society come across very poorly." They stumped up the money. As these things go I was entertained. Medium Lost Pict. There will be a lot of pressure for reburial in York and of course for a Catholic service. |
DontTreadOnMe | 05 Feb 2013 4:27 a.m. PST |
Who painted the 'R' above the body? Any theories? Those Richard III Society types are a bit full-on aren't they? |
LostPict | 05 Feb 2013 2:05 p.m. PST |
Got to admit this had me looking at WOTR minis last night. Sigh, I must resist! ;-) Thanks, Lost Pict |
Come In Nighthawk | 05 Feb 2013 4:02 p.m. PST |
test the DNA of the Glastonbury skeltons
?Como? Do you mean Artōrius and Gwenhwyfar? Without a known living descendant (and preferably descendants) to test any results against, the pairs' DNA would tell us only a very little. It could plausibly tell us if they were in fact Celts, assuming the Celtic Haplogroup/sub-Haplogroup has been well enough defined lately by "science." As an historian, what I have read of this DNA business of late suggests the consensus on this heading is lacking. However, testing the DNA could at least, broadly speaking, rule out the pair being Near-eastern, and I guess that would be something? |
imithe | 05 Feb 2013 4:24 p.m. PST |
|
Come In Nighthawk | 05 Feb 2013 6:40 p.m. PST |
The Return of the King. By the Perrys OOOOOOOhhhhhh-aaaaaHHHHHHHH! I WANT one! LOVE the little disabled marker on the splitting tarmac!! |