Tango01  | 30 Jan 2013 11:43 a.m. PST |
"In 1942, Nazi engineers devised a plan to build a 1,500-ton supertank. The P1000 Rat, it was to be the largest and fiercest industrial-age ground weapon the world had ever seen. In 1943, the project was cancelled. So how did its massive gun turret wind up on a coastal hilltop in Norway? The Rat had been among the projects almost supernatural in scope with which Hitler would demonstrate Germany industrial and military might. The shock-and-awe weapon would have served the dual roles of energizing the German populace and cowering state enemies with the sheer audacity of metal. Hitler called this gigantism. In early 1943, Hitler's Chief Armaments minister, Albert Speer, decided a monster-sized tank would be far too costly in resources, and provided too big a target for Allied forces which by then had demonstrated bombs capable of destroying the P1000 thick armor and cancelled the project. But a turret for the P1000 had already been built. It was a variant on a naval heavy cruiser turret as used in Gneisenau-class battleships, fitted with a 280 mm SK C/34 naval gun. What would they do with gear (and firepower) of that size?
" Full article here link Lucky they did not finish it and not settled in Normandy! Amicalement Armand |
| Rubber Suit Theatre | 30 Jan 2013 12:06 p.m. PST |
The Allies would have simply bombed, shelled, or coup-de-mained (new verb! yay!) the thing at significantly less cost than transporting it to France – where it probably would have sat uselessly bypassed in Brittany. |
| Charlie 12 | 30 Jan 2013 12:58 p.m. PST |
Another totally useless German fantasy project (like the Maus, Dora, etc.). The krauts wasted far too much time, effort and money on way too many of these things (of course, for us, that was a good thing
). |
Virtualscratchbuilder  | 30 Jan 2013 1:10 p.m. PST |
Bigger guns were in place at Cap Griz Nez. |
| Mr Pumblechook | 30 Jan 2013 1:26 p.m. PST |
|
| Woolshed Wargamer | 30 Jan 2013 2:41 p.m. PST |
I still want the model
Now there is a modeller. :) |
| zoneofcontrol | 30 Jan 2013 9:13 p.m. PST |
Just a little bit of rain and the supertank would have spent the rest of the war in a self-imposed "hull down" position. I wonder if they also took a crack at designing a tow vehicle to pull it out. |
| Grinning Norm | 31 Jan 2013 5:01 a.m. PST |
The tow vehicle would also have been too heavy. Or a fleet of a dozen tow-vehicles three times the size of the Maus, which in turn would all require some heavy tow vehicles. Would make an insane diorama that. |
Legion 4  | 31 Jan 2013 7:47 p.m. PST |
|
| tuscaloosa | 01 Feb 2013 7:42 p.m. PST |
I wonder how they moved it up to the position. |
| spontoon | 09 Feb 2013 12:31 p.m. PST |
The above drawing has the picture of a French ARL-44 titled "A-39 Tortoise". In fact the Tortoise looked very much like the U.S. T-28. Besides, what's so special about this gun? There is an actual turret from Gneisenau emplaced in Norway. |
| myrm11 | 25 Apr 2013 7:53 a.m. PST |
You sure its the ARL44? The angle of the rear of the track seems wrong – I thought it was the Black Prince put in rather than the Tortoise. |