
"Hail Caesar Battle of Hastings 1066" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Battle Reports Message Board
Action Log
18 Jan 2017 12:49 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from Historical Wargaming board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The next Teutonic Knights unit - Crossbowmen!
Featured Workbench Article Jay Wirth shows how using inks makes it easier to paint a 15mm scale army.
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
| Grigork | 17 Jan 2013 3:39 a.m. PST |
I'm new to posting on TMP and since I've been reviewing my favorite games from 2012 I'd thought I'd share. My eldest nephew asked to play a battle of Hastings game during a visit. In record time we put away the Napoleonic game and set up appropriate terrain and laid out the armies. I put together the troops based on an infantry unit roughly being 800 – 1000 strong as standard, getting my figures from the Osprey Campaign series book. I checked quickly with the Hail Caesar army list 2 to ensure I had it balanced, which it roughly was. We played on and off for 3 days to get a conclusion and we had a blast. I wrote up the game on my blog see the link: thewargamingmegalomaniac.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/hail-caesar-battle-of-hastings-1066.html |
| Ferbs Fighting Forces | 17 Jan 2013 4:30 a.m. PST |
|
| PzGeneral | 17 Jan 2013 5:06 a.m. PST |
Very kewl. Thanks  |
| elsyrsyn | 17 Jan 2013 7:16 a.m. PST |
Very nice AAR of what sounds like a great game – it certainly looks the part! Doug |
| religon | 17 Jan 2013 8:00 a.m. PST |
Thanks for sharing. How many hours of play did this game constitute? |
| darthfozzywig | 17 Jan 2013 9:55 a.m. PST |
Your batrep is great. Your background is hideous. :) |
| Great War Ace | 17 Jan 2013 11:36 a.m. PST |
Nice writeup. I have a few points to make; first a question: "Gyfrith"? What happened to Gyrth? The terrain seems far too open and featureless/flat to be the battlefield as described, wherever that actually was. Marshes and low ground flanked the English army on a ridgeline, with forest at their backs; of course, forest can be assumed off-table. There was no "turning the flanks" option for William; the English flanks were covered by the terrain. Not until the English lost their flanks to useless pursuits, could the invaders use their cavalry to threaten and attack the shortened English line in the flanks or even in the rear. If each of those units is c. 800 to 1,000 men, those are big armies! I tend toward c. 10K per side myself. But 11K to 16K is certainly possible
. |
| Grigork | 17 Jan 2013 11:47 a.m. PST |
I agree the terrain wasn't perfect, I put it together in a rush. All the names and numbers came from the Osprey Campaign book. |
| Great War Ace | 17 Jan 2013 8:33 p.m. PST |
In getting your fun-looking game "together in a rush", I think you must have gone on memory of the Osprey Campaign Series no. 13 book. You might want to check out your numbers and names again. Just a suggestion, because you can always edit your own blog post
. |
| Grigork | 22 Jan 2013 3:17 p.m. PST |
Gyfrith is my error. I checked my books and they all state Gyrth. I've no idea where I dreamt up Gyfrith, anyway I have hopefully changed this on the blog. Cheers. |
|