Help support TMP


"Scenery scale/size" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Scale Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2015) Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: 1/300 Scale Hot Wheels Blimp

You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.


Current Poll


1,867 hits since 6 Oct 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tony5806 Oct 2012 9:28 a.m. PST

In general, given that the average height of a 2 storey house in the UK, is around 8 metres to the ridge.
See link:
link

And if you say that the average male height in the UK, is 2 metres, rounded up.*
See link:
link

Would it be safe to say, when making or buying buildings, that on average, a ratio of 4:1 for any scale of models, would look realistic?

i.e. 10mm figures/models would have buildings that are 40 mm high, and 28 mm rounded up to 30 mm,* would have buildings that are 120 mm high?

Cyclops06 Oct 2012 9:48 a.m. PST

Personally I think that's too big, even for a 1:1 scale skirmish. As long as the doors are the right size you can go to about 2/3rds or even smaller and it looks fine, especially if you're playing anything bigger than 1:1 (1figure equals 1man).
But it's more about footprint than height. There are very few buildings represented at 1:1 for the footprint. They'd take up huge amounts of room.

Lion in the Stars06 Oct 2012 10:44 a.m. PST

Agreed. The footprint would be the killer. For example, my Dad's lot is roughly 85 by 115 feet. 1/60 scale for easy crunching makes the lot 17"x23". That's not really a playable size on the table.

Timmo uk06 Oct 2012 11:19 a.m. PST

I go down a scale so for 25mm I use 20mm buildings. Looks OK to me and you reduce the foot print a bit as well.

MajorB06 Oct 2012 12:05 p.m. PST

Agree with Timmo uk, always go down a size unless you are playing 1 figure = 1 man.

Unlucky General06 Oct 2012 1:55 p.m. PST

Tony,

I have always built to scale and proportional buildings and fortifications in the past. Whilst pleasing and very practical for wargaming within the buildings themselves I cannot help but concur with the above sentiments. Depending what you want the buildings to do, going for a minimal representation is often better, especially when building towns and city scapes whch you fight around rather than in. To-scale buildings are prehaps better used for skirmish based games. In future, I'll be looking to reduce the size of my buildings where possible.

Tony5806 Oct 2012 2:09 p.m. PST

Thanks, for the useful insights.

French Wargame Holidays06 Oct 2012 3:15 p.m. PST

I find height with wargames buildings is no real problem it is the footprint.

I tend to make buildings especially modern and ww2 20mm at least, with a small foot print but at scale in height.

I round 28mm down 25mm not rounded up to 30 as multi storey.

It really depends on the unit sizes and figure ratio as mentioned above.

cheers
Matt

MajorB07 Oct 2012 4:38 a.m. PST

I tend to make buildings especially modern and ww2 20mm at least, with a small foot print but at scale in height.

I cinsidered doing that, but I just don't like the look of tall spindly buildings.

I suppose I've always done the same, using railway building models at HO (1:87) for 1:72 and 1:76.

Um … down a scale from 1/72 and 1/76 would be 15mm.

Rrobbyrobot07 Oct 2012 6:10 a.m. PST

I tend to use the same scale for buildings and miniatures. Though I sometimes use HO scale railroad buildings with my 15mm WW2 stuff.
For TSATF, and WW2 games this is not a problem. But when I'm using Bundok and Bayonette for larger British Colonial games there is a scale problem. But it can be dealt with. Just don't use the larger buildings.

GeoffQRF07 Oct 2012 11:29 a.m. PST

Table scale is rarely (if ever) true to model scale. Otherwise I wouldn't really be able to more than about 700-800 scale yards along an 8' table in 15mm…

MajorB07 Oct 2012 12:53 p.m. PST

But Margard, if 28mm is, say, 1:56, and 1:72 is "down a scale", that's 16 points. 1:72 to 1:87 is pretty close, 15 points, so I'm not sure what you mean?

Scales, or I should say, sizes of wargames figures are:

54mm
40mm
28/30mm
25mm
20mm
15mm
10mm
5/6mm

So, down a scale from 20mm (i.e 1/72 or 1/76) is 15mm.

Also, many building kits labelled as "HO" are actually 1/76 particularly if they are of British outline.

Fuebalashi Dakasonomichi07 Oct 2012 1:20 p.m. PST

Funny how folk get sniffy about vehicles being spot on scale, yet houses can look lilliputian and that's okay.

28mm figures, should I be looking for O scale or OO scale buildings then?

MajorB07 Oct 2012 1:44 p.m. PST

Funny how folk get sniffy about vehicles being spot on scale, yet houses can look lilliputian and that's okay.

It's a by product of the difference between figure size and ground scale. Buildings should be smaller because the ground scale is smaller.

28mm figures, should I be looking for O scale or OO scale buildings then?

For skirmish games where 1 figure is 1 man then ideally you want 1/56 scale buildings (or thereabouts).

O scale in the UK is commonly 1:43.5, in continental Europe it is commonly 1:45 though 1:43.5 is also used particularly in France, and in the USA 1:48. All of which are too big.

OO scale is 1/76 which is too small.

Probably the best solution is to either build your own or buy purpose designed 28mm buildings from companies such as Warbases.
link

For non-skirmish games then I'd suggest OO scale buildings.

Fuebalashi Dakasonomichi07 Oct 2012 10:17 p.m. PST

Many thanks, old chap!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.