Help support TMP


"CSS Alabama " Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Chaos in Carpathia


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Book Review


1,499 hits since 25 Aug 2012
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP25 Aug 2012 9:20 p.m. PST

Reading this interesting article about the CSS Alabama…

link

Took my atention this part:

"…The transfer was completed on August 24. Semmes assembled twenty-four officers and 120 enlisted sailors (the vast majority being Englishmen) to announce his intentions. He said, "We are going to burn, sink, and destroy the commerce of the United States." …"

So, if mostly of the crew of a Confederate ship was british and they became prisioners of war, did they be considered by the Union as "neutrals"? Or they became common prisioners as any other Rebel soldier/sailor?

Could british citizens under the flag of the Confederation protest if they were treated with the rigor of war by the Union?
Could they managed to be free by their special "status"?
If not, what did the British government for them once they became prisioners?

Thanks in advance for your guidance.

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Nashville Supporting Member of TMP25 Aug 2012 11:34 p.m. PST

The issue was not confined just to the open sea. There were a host of foreign nationals who joined the union almost literally off the immigration boat. Bottom line… You join the army or navy and are captured you are a POW of the enemy , notwithstanding your ostensible nationality.

jowady25 Aug 2012 11:59 p.m. PST

Joining the military force of a warring nation negates your status as a neutral. If captured you are treated as a PoW. In fact the presence of so many British sailors in the Alabama's crew caused a diplomatic incident and was brought up by the US post-war in the "Alabama Claims". in which Britain was found liable for some of the damages caused by the Southern Raiders built in Britain.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP26 Aug 2012 1:10 p.m. PST

Very interesting!.
Thanks for your guidance boys!

Amicalement
Armand

Rudysnelson28 Aug 2012 1:29 p.m. PST

I thought most of the CSS Alabama crew was interned in France where the Ship was sunk.

Or did the USS Keersage rescue all of the CSA sailors?

Foreign nationals under the colors of either country would be treated as POWs. As mentioned both sides had foreign nationals enlist whether emmigrants or mercenaries.

Cloudy29 Aug 2012 7:17 a.m. PST

I believe in re: jowady's comment that it wasn't that the crew was captured, it was the fact that most of them were British – in a British-built vessel that was the issue when it came to affixing blame in the "Alabama Claims".

Syr Otto29 Aug 2012 9:44 a.m. PST

The Keersage picked up most of the Alabama's crew, but as they did, they accepted help from the Deerhound, a British yacht. Once the 41 cremen were abord the Deerhound, she fled back to port, allowing them to be interned in France rather than held as POWs by the US.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP29 Aug 2012 10:01 p.m. PST

So, to be British born had their advantages!.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.