
"CSS Alabama " Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ironclads (1862-1889) Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 25 Aug 2012 9:20 p.m. PST |
Reading this interesting article about the CSS Alabama
link Took my atention this part: "
The transfer was completed on August 24. Semmes assembled twenty-four officers and 120 enlisted sailors (the vast majority being Englishmen) to announce his intentions. He said, "We are going to burn, sink, and destroy the commerce of the United States."
" So, if mostly of the crew of a Confederate ship was british and they became prisioners of war, did they be considered by the Union as "neutrals"? Or they became common prisioners as any other Rebel soldier/sailor? Could british citizens under the flag of the Confederation protest if they were treated with the rigor of war by the Union? Could they managed to be free by their special "status"? If not, what did the British government for them once they became prisioners? Thanks in advance for your guidance. Amicalement Armand |
Nashville  | 25 Aug 2012 11:34 p.m. PST |
The issue was not confined just to the open sea. There were a host of foreign nationals who joined the union almost literally off the immigration boat. Bottom line
You join the army or navy and are captured you are a POW of the enemy , notwithstanding your ostensible nationality. |
| jowady | 25 Aug 2012 11:59 p.m. PST |
Joining the military force of a warring nation negates your status as a neutral. If captured you are treated as a PoW. In fact the presence of so many British sailors in the Alabama's crew caused a diplomatic incident and was brought up by the US post-war in the "Alabama Claims". in which Britain was found liable for some of the damages caused by the Southern Raiders built in Britain. |
Tango01  | 26 Aug 2012 1:10 p.m. PST |
Very interesting!. Thanks for your guidance boys! Amicalement Armand |
| Rudysnelson | 28 Aug 2012 1:29 p.m. PST |
I thought most of the CSS Alabama crew was interned in France where the Ship was sunk. Or did the USS Keersage rescue all of the CSA sailors? Foreign nationals under the colors of either country would be treated as POWs. As mentioned both sides had foreign nationals enlist whether emmigrants or mercenaries. |
| Cloudy | 29 Aug 2012 7:17 a.m. PST |
I believe in re: jowady's comment that it wasn't that the crew was captured, it was the fact that most of them were British – in a British-built vessel that was the issue when it came to affixing blame in the "Alabama Claims". |
| Syr Otto | 29 Aug 2012 9:44 a.m. PST |
The Keersage picked up most of the Alabama's crew, but as they did, they accepted help from the Deerhound, a British yacht. Once the 41 cremen were abord the Deerhound, she fled back to port, allowing them to be interned in France rather than held as POWs by the US. |
Tango01  | 29 Aug 2012 10:01 p.m. PST |
So, to be British born had their advantages!. Amicalement Armand |
|