
"Battlegames review of Maurice" Topic
51 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Magazines and Periodicals Message Board Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral 18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article Will "embedding" improve the treebases?
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Pages: 1 2
| Marc the plastics fan | 19 Jul 2012 6:56 a.m. PST |
Welcome back DAF. if I had a problem with the reviw, is that it did not go far enough either way. I felt it read like someone had not played it to experience its complexities and flavour, just had a read through. Which would be like someone reviewing your figures based on text only, without having seen them. It might be ok, but a bit incomplete. Does that make sense? And with imagi's – that is really around the character cards and the campaign system, more than the rules. It appears that Sam has tried to create a toolkit to let players customise their Imagi armies with certain "national" characteristics, so from that perspective I think it will be quite fun for Imagi players. |
Pages: 1 2
|